News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Mark Saltzman

  • Karma: +0/-0
http://onegolferstravels.blogspot.com/2012/01/beacon-hall-golf-club-review.html


Beacon Hall Golf Club
Aurora, Ontario, Canada

Architect: Bob Cupp (1988)

Yardage: 7,001 Yards, Par 72

Rating/Slope: 74.3/148


My Quick Review: Two very distinct nines that transition flawlessly, natural use of great golfing terrain, bold green shaping and contouring, and it might just be the best conditioned course in Canada.




My Thoughts

As I considered the holes to include in the 'Holes to Note' section below, I realized Beacon Hall truly has 18 good holes.  I gave serious consideration to including every hole on the golf course, with the exception of holes 1, 17 and 18 -- all three are decent holes, but not of the quality of the rest of the course.  Beacon Hall crescendo's perfectly with holes 14 to 16, but the two finishing holes are a bit of a disappointment.

Course conditioning is generally of little interest to me as it can fluctuate over the course of the season.  Nevertheless, it is necessary to recognize the flawless conditioning at Beacon Hall -- among the very best I have seen anywhere.  The fairways were lush green and beautifully cross-cut, but they were hard and bouncy, and the greens were firm and very fast.

Beacon Hall has a very natural feel.  In truth, I have no idea how much land was moved to build the golf course, but as I traversed the mounds between the first tee and fairway, I got the feeling that course was routed using the land's natural features.  Containment mounding which plagued many courses built in the same era as Beacon Hall is (thankfully) nowhere to be found.

The shape of the greens at Beacon Hall is very creative.  Many greens are designed to lay at an angle to fairway, providing a clear advantage for a properly placed tee shot.  Though the first and eighteenth greens are somewhat 'ho-hum' and circular in shape, the remainder of the greens are very bold in shape, including the left-to-right angled third; 50-yard-wide eighth; devilishly tiny 8th; and horseshoe'd 17th.




Holes to Note

Hole 2: Par 4, 360 Yards
The brilliant strategic design begins at the second.  Though it appears narrow, there is a fair amount of room left of the fairway bunkers.  Less aggressive players will try to play left of the bunkers, while aggressive players will try to carry the bunkers to leave the ideal approach angle into the green.

2nd Tee




The approach to the second gets much easier the farther right one is in the fairway as the green angles from right to left.  Approaching from the left requires a carry over two of the deepest bunkers on the golf course.

2nd Approach





The green is very narrow.  Approaching from the right allows the golfer to play down the throat of the green, but it is still no easy shot.

2nd Green





Hole 3: Par 3, 191 Yards

The third is the first of a great set of par-3s.  The tee shot is played significantly downhill to a green  that angles from left-to-right.  The tee shot begs for a high cut, and while missing short in the swale or deep front bunkers seems bad, missing long is the only place you really do not want to be.

3rd Back Tee




From the back tee there is no option to run the ball onto the green, but as the golfer moves up in tee boxes, the approach angle gets easier.

3rd Middle Tee




Missing in the little swale short of the green leaves a simple pitch into the slope of the green.

Short of the 3rd Green - Note the False-Front





Finding the 3rd green is no easy task, but the job is not done yet.  The green slopes considerably from back-right to front-left, and most disconcerting is the hump on the green just over the deep fronting bunker that can serve to kick very good shots into a very bad spot over the green.

3rd Green







Hole 4: Par 5, 573 Yards

The first of a very strong set of par-5s that require the golfer to plan his route to the hole.  The 4th is a classic up then down par-5, with the green completely hidden from view until the golfer crests the hill to play his approach to the green.  Even though there is plenty of corridor width, the tee shot is intimidating as thick woods guard both sides of the fairway.  Bunkers are benched into the hill short of the fairway, which adds visual appeal, but ultimately adds no strategic interest.

4th Tee




The tee shot dictates decision-making on the second shot, which requires a shot to crest the hill to have a look at the green.  The duo of fairway bunkers lay some 150 yards short of the green.  After a good tee shot, most players will have at least 170 yards to carry the bunkers.  Of course, the option of threading the needle between the bunkers is available to the fool-hearty!

An Intimidating 2nd Shot at the 4th




Upon cresting the hill, the golfer is given his first glimpse of the green, which sits naturally in a hollow below the grade of the fairway.

Approach from 130 Yards




It is not until the golfer gets to within 100 yards of the green is the depth of the greenside bunkering revealed.  Given the shallowness of the green and the penalty for missing short, laying up to wedge distance (as opposed to farther away) is of significant value.

Approach from 100 Yards




Deep Greenside Bunkering




This picture, unfortunately, fails to capture the undulation in the 4th green.  The small back portion of the green is fairly flat, while the portion of the green close to the bunkers is fairly undulating.

4th Green



4th from Behind





Hole 5: Par 4, 433 Yards

The 5th is the best par-4 on the golf course, and is one of the very best in all of Ontario.  The 5th is a wonderfully natural hole, that looks like it was just laying there waiting to be found by Bob Cupp.  Large-scale mounding heaves back-and-forth as the golfer approaches the canted fairway.   Bunkering benched naturally into the hill on the left penalizes shots bailed-out too far.  Just like the 4th, the green is completely hidden from the tee.
The 5th calls for a fade off the tee and a draw into the green.  The fairway ends about 140 yards short of the green (290 from the tee) so it is just a 3W or less for the longer hitters.

5th Tee




The approach to the 5th is played significantly downhill to a green that sits comfortably next to a huge mound right of the green.

5th Approach




Using the mound right of the green is not always advisable.  On occasion, balls have been known to bounce off the hill and onto the green, but equally often balls will stay on the hill leaving a very awkward lie, and even less frequently balls will carom off the hill and traverse the length of the green to the rough on the other side.

5th Approach - Zoomed In




5th from Behind





Hole 8: Par 3, 165 Yards
The 8th is a very clever short par-3, demanding nothing less than perfection from the golfer.  The green is open in front and the widest area is the fringe short of the green.  Water lays just feet off the left of the green.  The bunker that dominates the visual from the tee is 15 yards short of the green and should not impact the playing of the hole -- but it does hide the right portion of the green.  A massive ridge separates the front 1/3 of the green from the back 2/3.  Shots played to the wrong side of the ridge, especially long of the ridge to a front pin, leave a nearly impossible two-putt.

8th Tee




8th Over Bunker -- Lots of Width over Bunker




8th from Behind





Hole 9: Par 4, 394 Yards

The 9th is yet another up then down hole with a green that is blind from the tee (notice the theme? can't see the green from the tee on 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 on the front nine alone).  The bunkering on the left is eye-candy as it should not be in play and a well-struck tee shot will crest the hill.  Longer hitters should beware as tee shots longer than 260 will leave an awkward downhill stance to an uphill green.

9th Tee




The approach to the 9th is played over a gully to an amazing green.  The green is protected by very deep bunkers set-back from the green leaving a very difficult recovery.  The bunkers short of the green are bad, but finding the bunker over the green is worse -- find that bunker and it is almost impossible to find the green from there.

9th Approach




The green is protected by one of the largest false-fronts I have ever seen.  Land on the front edge of the green and your ball will roll 50 yards down the fairway to the bottom of the gully.

A Huge False-Front on the 9th




The 9th green is WILD.  Phenomenally shaped and with really interesting internal contours.  Most pins are placed on the left portion of the green, which is ostensibly easier to access, but is protected by the false-front, and has a tiny pinnable shelf in the back portion.

9th Green from Left




The back portion of the green requires a carry over the deep front greenside bunkers.  Shots landing on the front portion of the green to a back pin leave an almost impossible putt over a large ridge that bisects the green.

9th Green from Behind




9th from Behind





Hole 10: Par 5, 586 Yards

After a 100 ft walk from 9th green to the 10th tee, it is amazing to see the transformation from tree-lined parkland golf to the wide open vista of links-like golf.  Another blind tee shot.  The ideal tee-ball will challenge the bunkers on the right to find a huge speed-slot.  Despite the length on the scorecard, this hole (with a favorable wind) is reachable in two.

10th Tee




After the wide-open feel of the tee shot, the remainder of the 10th is contained; carved through hills left and right, there is little room to miss.  Most golfers will lay-up short of the pond, leaving a wedge into the green.

10th Second Shot







The approach to the 10th is played over a small pond.  Even though the green is quite large, the scale of the hill behind the green and closeness of the fronting pond make it feel quite small.  Also, of note, is the ground-game option for those unable (or unwilling) to carry the lake on the approach.

10th Approach




10th from Behind





Hole 11: Par 3, 173 Yards

The 11th is a really cool par-3 with another very natural feeling greensite.  The green is deep, but very narrow and located at the bottom of a small bowl.  Again, the bunkering is deep and setback from the green making it more difficult to find, but really difficult to recover from.

11th Tee




Large Scale Bunkering on the 11th




There is a MASSIVE bailout to the right of the green. Honestly, this features confused me.  I understand that missing left is bad, so it's OK to have a bailout right, and it should be difficult to recover from there (and it certainly is), but I have no idea why the bailout need be 50 YARDS WIDE!?  I am open to ideas!

HUGE Bailout Right of 11th Green




The green has a false front making the first 1/4 of the green unpinnable.  A ridge runs across the green 2/3 way back, and the back 1/3 of the green slopes away from the tee.  This is an awesome green on a very good hole.

11th Green from Right





Hole 15: Par 5, 580 Yards

The 15th is a really good split-fairway par-5.  The easier and more obvious route is to the right, around the bunkers.  But, there is also fairway over the two bunkers farthest to the left in the picture below.  It is about 225 yards to carry from the member's tee.  The alternate fairway is fairly narrow and at an angle to the tee, making it very difficult to find, but if successful, the golfer will have 240 yards or less for a second shot, versus the 300+ yard second he would have if playing to the right.

15th Tee




If laying-up, one has the choice of laying up to the top of the hill, leaving a flatter lie, a better view of the green and an only slightly uphill approach.

15th Approach from 150 Yards





Alternatively, the golfer can lay-up to the bottom of the hill leaving a very uphill approach to a really cool skyline green.  From here it is very difficult to judge distance, so beware the false-front!

15th Approach from 75 Yards




The 15th green is the most tilted on the course.  The green slopes significantly from back-to-front.  Putting from long of the pin is very difficult and the golfer risks putting off the green and down the false-front.  There's nothing more embarrassing than having to put your putter away and having to reach for your wedge...!

15th Green from Left





Hole 16: Par 3, 223 Yards

This is one of those holes that make you say "wow" as soon as you step on the tee.  The 16th is one of the best long par-3s in the country.  This is another hole that looks like it was just found on the terrain.  There is 60 yards of bailout to the left of the green and yet the golfer's eye is drawn to the pin and the bunkers on the right and the thrill of the Hero Shot.

16th Tee





The forward tees, while shorter, are completely blind and may just be more difficult than the back tees...

16th Forward Tees -- Nice Skyline Green from Here!




With a strong left-to-right crosswind, it is easy to miss short-right.  But, missing there is bad...

Right of 16th Green (yep, that's my ball, oops!)




16th from Behind



Beacon Hall is one of the very best modern golf courses in Canada.  Picking holes for this review was very difficult, as almost every hole on the course is worthy of study. 

Lou_Duran

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2012, 11:34:51 AM »
Thanks Mark.  It's been nearly 15 years since I got to play Beacon Hall.  I thought the variety, beauty, conditioning, and challenge (played bogie golf from the back tees after shooting par at Thornhill the day before) were outstanding.  Lesser reactions from others on this site familiar with the course puzzled me.  I thought that perhaps my limited experience with Canada golf coupled with my fondness for the developer got in the way.  I am glad to hear that you think highly of BH and for your wonderful post that brought back memories of that fantastic day.  Thanks. 

Peter Pallotta

Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2012, 08:06:44 PM »
My thanks too, Mark, for another excellent essay.  My first ever extended look at lovely Beacon Hall.

Peter

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2012, 01:57:59 AM »
Mark

Nice job with showing off the course, however, I wonder if the camera is playing tricks.  Its hard for me to look past the many bunkers which look awkward in the ground and awkwardly placed.  Anybody else put off by the bunkering?

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Harris Nepon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2012, 07:22:06 AM »
Mark,

Nice job on another profile.

I got to play Beacon the summer before last and found it to be ok. I wasn't overly impressed with the course. First off, I found the transition from parkland (front 9) to Links (back 9) odd to say the least. When I think of a great course I rank it in my own mind based on memorable holes. At Beacon, not one hole really stuck out in my mind.

Great conditioning is right. Very private, so pace of play was great. Nice experience. Not a place I would strive to get back to.


Matt Bosela

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2012, 01:15:33 PM »
Another great review Mark.  It's unfortunate that most people here at GCA don't seem to care about Canadian courses, as many of your CDN photo reviews deserve a lot more attention and feedback.

Thomas McBroom is listed as a co-designer of Beacon Hall but you didn't mention him at all - I don't profess to know how much he contributed to the design, especially since this would have been relatively early in his career - do you know how much work he did with Cupp?

While it's a solid piece of work, I think that Beacon Hall is generally overrated and I'd have it ranked much lower than the top five rating its been given by Golfweek and the #8 in Canada ranking given by ScoreGolf, perhaps near the bottom of the top 20.  Like Harris mentioned above, the difference between the parkland front and the "links-styled" back nine was jarring - there's great golf on both sides but I just felt that there was something missing from a cohesiveness standpoint.

As a walking golfer myself, I will admit this: they have the most beautiful cart paths I've ever seen if that kind of thing floats your boat.  Wall-to-wall interlocking brick.  They aren't lacking for money, that's for sure.

That all said, I'd like to go back someday, as it's a great test of golf.  Frankly, I'm surprised the Canadian Open hasn't been played there...they seem to have the necessary room for infrastructure and the RCGA might like the fact that it could be set up similar to their personal favourite, Glen Abbey.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2012, 01:18:02 PM by Matt Bosela »

Lou_Duran

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2012, 02:03:30 PM »
Matt,

Golf is a Big World.  The thing you seem to dislike- the difference in styles front to back- I consider a strength.  IMO, variety is the spice of life in golf and many other things.  The back is more open and I am a fan of an unorthodox-variety enhancing equal mix of 3s, 4s, and 5s.  Unlike Harris, I saw a bunch of outstanding holes, and even after 15 years and maybe 300+ new courses played since my only visit, I remember several of them.  It is a walkable course, but carts and the paths to move them do not bother me at all.  BTW, I also think highly of Glen Abbey.

I spent the better part of a week with the developer and my recollection is that Bob Cupp was intimately involved.  We also played Thornill, Deerhurst Highlands (Cupp and McBroom) and Port Carling GC (McBroom) during this trip, as well as a few times around the delightful 9-hole Diamond-in-the-Ruff.  All were enjoyable; BH was a notch above, at least.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2012, 02:15:44 PM by Lou_Duran »

Mark Saltzman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Beacon Hall GC Course Profile (B. Cupp, 1988) - GW Canadian #4 Modern
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2012, 05:35:04 PM »
Wow, an honour to have the Big World Theory quoted in one of my posts!

Matt, thank you.  I am a bit surprised how little discussion some of the Canadian courses profiled have received... especially one like Beacon Hall, which is consistently a Canadian top-10.

Leaving out McBroom was an error of omission.  I was not aware that he had design credit for Beacon.

Interesting that you and Harris did not like the front-to-back nine transition.  I really liked it.  Maybe it is because I know it was coming and was ready for it?

I agree with Lou, though, it certainly helps to add variety.