Yesterday, I was watching an interview with investing great Charles Ellis. He is a big proponent of passive investing (or "indexing"), and one of the metaphors he uses to describe investing is "a loser's game." That is, investing is a business where the person who makes the fewest mistakes, rather than the one who makes big bets that occasionally pay off, will be most successful. Ellis describes this idea in his book, Investment Policy, and he also uses golf as an example of a "loser's game."
My questions to the group:
1. Is golf truly a loser's game?
2. Does great golf architecture reward those who win at the loser's game (i.e. the plodder who makes few mistakes)? Or, is this type of architecture boring? Does great golf architecture reward gambling and aggressive play more than conservative play?