News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Shane Gurnett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #25 on: January 04, 2002, 02:49:17 AM »
Greg

Re the pot bunkers at Barwon Heads, I think you mean the ones on the 14th and 15th, which I agree look ordinary and out of character with the rest of the course. Not so sure about Vic, but haven't been down there for a while.

The TWP style of pot bunkers are very much a love it or hate it thing. I must confess I'm not a fan. I think they also feaure heavily on the new TWP design at Sandhurst in Carrum (whenever it comes out of the ground).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom MacWood (Guest)

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2002, 04:22:59 AM »
What is the topography like at Huningdale? Any particular reason why Alison's style of bunkering would not have felt good in Melebourne?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Paul Turner

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2002, 01:20:24 PM »
Looking at NAF's review of Kawana, I don't see simple pot bunkers.  Alison's bunkers have style and were probably more dramatic originally.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Paul Turner

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2002, 01:37:34 PM »
Timber Point was possibly Alison's finest design with vast expanses of sand and I don't remember any pot bunkers in old photos of that course.  

I remember Peter Thomson speculating on what Royal Melbourne would have been like with Colt instead of Mackenzie.  For some reason he predicted that Colt might implement the style he used at Lytham i.e. hundereds of pots.  But he completely ignored Colt's work on the London heathlands which used to have some really dramatic bunkers.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Greg Ramsay

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2002, 02:21:04 PM »
When was Timber Point built?  I suspect that Alison moved from the pot style bunkers to the broader sandy wastes later in his career, so when he was doing the planning for Huntingdale he was still a pot bunker man.  Having said that, is Kawana built on sand?  If not, then perhaps he opted for pots there for simplicity, whereas in the Sandbelt he may have looked at Mackenzies work at Kingston Heath and Royal Melbourne and said 'i gotta get me some o dat!'  In truth, looking at Alison's routing of Huntingdale, his line drawings of all the bunkering generally depict open bunkers, with the exception of a pot in the middle of the 10th and around a few other fairways.  So perhaps his pots at Kawana and elsewhere in Japan were a response to the environment, and not his general policy.

Not sure about Peter Thomson's hypothetical question r.e. Colt v. Alison, but lets all just be happy that we have the wonderful bunkering in the sandbelt that we do- we'll leave the rest up to conjecture!  I have always found Dick Wilson's bunkering at Metropolitan interesting, you can see that he has gone for an American version of Mackenzies waves, i.e all the tongues in the bunkers are manicured and mown, whereas at KHeath and RMelbourne, the heath wonderfully grows all around the tongues and through the bunkers.  I wonder why Metro ever chose Dick Wilson, perhaps they had heard he did a good renovation of Donald Ross' original Seminole.
Much to ponder!
Greg Ramsay
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom MacWood (Guest)

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2002, 07:06:22 PM »
I'm not sure catagorizing Alison's bunkers as pots would be totally accurate. His bunkers have always had the reputation of being exceedingly deep - which they are, but not like a typical pot bunker. From what I have seen, Alison liked to elevate his greens on very high locations and place his bunker well below the green with sand flashed up the very high face. And where the ground was flattish, he'd sometimes build up the bunkers to create the severity of a bunker built into a hillside.

In the early 20's the Ohio courses of Kirtland and Lone Nation have these characteristics. Old photos of Timber Point and Sea Island from the mid to late 20's have this character. His Japanese work form the early 30's also refelct this style. I'd guess that is what he invisioned at Huntingdale in the mid to late 30's and that is why I asked what the terrain was like - unfortunately he never stepped foot in Australia.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Peter Goss

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2002, 10:06:38 PM »
Tom
I would describe the Huntingdale topography as a front nine of undulating features with a moderate hill running from the 3rd green up the fourth fairway and peaking on the 5th green/6th tee/7th green complex. The back nine is relatively flat to gently undulating. Greg may be able to give a more precise description with his (?) topographical map.

Greg
I am a member at Sale (Victoria) and haven't played the new holes at Huntingdale, but note your comments regarding the redesigned holes with bunkering in front of the green. Berriman designed Sale and placed bunkers in front of a couple of par 4 holes. Did the front of green bunkering on holes 2, 8, 13 and 18 at Huntingdale appear on Allison's original plan or did Berriman put them in when he built the course? In other words, was front of green bunkering on par 4s an Allisonism or a characteristic of Berriman? And was the new front of green bunkering trying to stay within "style"?
Personally I enjoy the variety of bunkers different courses and architects can throw up, but the Royal Melbourne bunkering is spectacular. On the other hand, I wouldn't knock back having regular access to a Royal Melbourne with pot bunkers in the same strategic locations!!

Shane
I note your comments regarding the dissatisfaction of members with the TWP bunkering because it was not in keeping with the character of Barwon Heads or other courses mentioned. Could you comment whether the members or yourself regarded the bunkers as good or otherwise in a strategic sense? Or did the visual difference from other bunkering styles stifle debate on strategic issues?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom MacWood (Guest)

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #32 on: January 05, 2002, 07:58:18 AM »
Greg
Earlier you wrote that Alison routed/designed Barwon Heads, did he design the course or did you mean to write Huntingdale? How would you describe the bunkers that Berriman built at Huntingdale? We know Alison didn't come to Australia, do we know if Berriman ever went to see Alison or his work somewhere in the world?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Mike Duffy

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #33 on: January 05, 2002, 04:15:00 PM »
Tom,

Berriman's only overseas jaunt, as far as I can ascertain, was to New Zealand in 1964, in order to submit a tender for the construction and design of the Wairakei International Golf Course in the thermal areas of the North Island.

The contract was eventually awarded to Commander John D. Harris, a retired Royal Navy officer.

Berriman's last work was Amstel Golf Club in Melbourne's outer south-east. However, his name is not appended to that design today, as the then captain of the new club, so it legend has it, went out one evening, saw Berriman's pegging and moved most of the stakes.

Berriman hearing of this went out to inspect the site and asked the captain why he had changed the layout. The captain replied that the course was too long.

Berriman was reported to have said, "Then it is no longer my design," and handed his cheque back to the club.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Greg Ramsay

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #34 on: January 05, 2002, 04:39:37 PM »
Peter's description of the undulations is pretty good- some on the front 9, but little on the back. And that is a great query regarding the front of green bunkering- Berriman or Alison?, I'll have to look up the routing again, I don't recall any in front of greens except on 8, and the first par 3 on the back 9 (11?)  i'll look it up.

As for TWP's strategic bunkering, i do think that they are very good at placing of bunkers to create interest and make you think about the positioning of the ball from the tee.  Perhaps they overdo the middle of the fairway bunker a bit, and as I have already said, I don't think their trademark pots are appropriate in all golfing landscapes, but overall their strategic bunkering is very good.

If I said that Allison designed Barwon Heads, then I was wrong, probably confused by my comments on TWP's bunkering there.  That course was layed out by a Low from Carnoustie, I think it was George? and then Mackenzie commented on the course when he was in Melbourne in 1926.

Greg Ramsay
www.barnbougledunes.com
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Paul Daley

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #35 on: January 06, 2002, 06:25:41 AM »
Hey, what a juicy little Huntingdale thread. Sorry for the delay in getting back.

NAF: It is true, Allison never set foot in Melbourne. The bunkering style is not an outstanding feature of Huntingdale, and they do visually differ from nearby sandbelt courses. In addition, pre Newton Grant & Spencer redesign,
the fairway bunkers were relatively low-lipped. For instance, the bunkers at the far end of the 4th fairway (since departed), the ones flanking both sides of the 7th, 13th fairway, 14th, the right-hand side 16th (ex-18th) which is now considerably built up by NGS. From all of these fairway bunkers, you always fancied yourself to play a decent recovery, and on some holes find the green. Now, forget the green, or any silly notion of reasonable advancement on the 16th, or from the new addition 18th hole bunkering. The liberal bunker on the 13th hole still provides a sporting chance of success.

RAN:

The course routing is okay at Huntingdale but nothing remarkable. In part, this may be due to being built upon a terribly sqeezed in plot of land. Goodness, we don't even have a decent short-game practice facility. As you say, both nines wend their way back to the clubhouse, but I do think that some of the blandness that Tom Doak referred to, is related to the predominantly north-south, or south-north direction of holes. What excites me about Royal, KH, Metro, Vic ...  is the terrific variety of east-west, and west-east, plus a few good old north-south and south-north configurations thrown in for good measure.

At the "Dale", the holes can be absolute ball-breakers into the southerly wind.

On balance, I would have to say that Allison put together a "safe" and conservative routing - one, comensurate with doing it from 12000 miles away!

In reality, without two strokes of luck, C.H. Allison's name would never have been associated with Huntingdale. The club was initially well into negotiations with local design firm, Jackson and Falconer. Jackson was a plus figure golfer, and ex-State champion. Unaccountably, things soured.

The second incident, was a chance meeting in London with Allison and a prominent Eastern member, R.Kinsman. Kinsman related the tale of woe to Allison about how negotiations had soured with Jackson-Falconer, ... and the rest is history. Allison shortly accepted the club's offer of 100 guineas.

HARLEY:

Like you, I'm viewing the fact that Allison never set foot in town as a bonus, in regard to the possibility that the famed sandbelt bunkering of Mackenzie, Russell, and  Morcom may not have become as strong a trademark.  At the very least, had Allison showed up and put in bunkers that were akin to his trademark, the 'mackenzie' look would have had a competitor. It is pure speculation as to how future committes would have viewed the sharply contrasting styles. Perhaps they may have viewed Mack style bunkers as "on the nose"?

TE PAUL:

Dicey all right, but he had a few of things in his favour:

(1) Huntingdale is relatively flat - the back nine was built upon a reclaimed swamp. Pleasingly for its members, the front nine utilises some undualting terrain; the high points being the 4th tee, 5th, 6th, 7th holes and 8th teeing ground.

(2) Allison had at his disposal an unusually gifted man called A.G. Dempster who, as an engineer, cabled meticulous survey plans at frequent intervals to London. Apparently, Dempster's site surveys detailed every few square metres of ground (rise and fall) from two standpoints: the course from east-to-west, and also from north-to-south.

(3) Allison must still have acknowledged the uncertain nature of what he was undertaking. I say this, because as a precaution against failure, he made allowances for two green sites at every hole in his design! And so with Berriman on the ground in Australia, it gave him an excellent chance to put his own stamp on the course - and he did - by not always adhereing to Allison's first choice of green site. In addition, Berriman was encouraged to make suggestions, and Allison reputedly accepted several of them. In light of this, it is perhaps unfair that Berriman is not accorded co-designer status at Huntingdale.

Of note, the plan that Allison sent from England, did not fit into the tight property. Berriman was forced to make changes. Another major oversight, was that Allison failed to make any provisions for Ladies tees. Was he perhaps a male chauvanist?

(4) The relative safety of designing a north-south course

TOM MaCWOOD
 
To my knowledge, Allison and Berriman did not know each other, although on account of Berriman being English, I can see how the rumour started. Why Berriman? A good question. As Michael Clayton pointed out, Berriman was the curator of Eastern Golf Club. A little history will further demonstrate the connection. In the early 1920s, Berriman was a gardener at a 76-acre property named Tullamore, which in 1924 became the home of the Eastern Golf Club. The committee built a 12 hole layout and Berriman - reputedly a brute of a speciman - did much of the hard 'yakka'. He became Eastern's curator, and in 1941, a breakaway group of members esacped the claybelt and Huntingdale Golf Club was duly formed. As far back as 1937, a five-pound deposit was placed on the land. It was always naturally assumed that Berriman would transfer down south. He did so, and remarkably, for a good deal of time he was curator at both clubs.

I found it intersting to read Colt's letter about the Bombay job. Thank you for posting it. Was Allison worried about the 'opportunity' cost of accepting the Huntingdale job and not travelling out? Not likely, I say this because he priced his fee specifically to take into account his NOT travelling. The H'dale committee was pleasantly surprised by the reasonable fee and expected it to be much higher.

Greg and Shane:

Re - the bunkers. Until recently, I had always assumed that the incidence of front-of-green bunkering disallowed the run-up approach. But when actually reviewing it in my mind, I found this wasn't the case. Consider where you can run the ball into the greens: 1st, 4th (after the new change), 5th (to a small degree), 6th, 7th, 9th, 11th, 13th, 14th (if you are using a rifle), 17th (marginally now). About 50% of the holes. You may be as surprised as me.

One very interesting fact about Huntingdale's bunkering is the almost complete absence of rear bunkers. They appear behind the right-half of the 12th green, and behind the 16th green (old 18th) only. Seems like a definite bias from Allison against them!

However, at nearly all the greens, they are heavily flanked by bunkers. The exceptions are 1st, 9th, 15th, 17th, and 18th greens which presents its bunkering on one side of the green only.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom MacWood (Guest)

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #36 on: January 06, 2002, 07:34:46 AM »
Paul
There seems to be general agreement that it was a blessing that Alison never worked within Australia - that is a curious stance considering there also seems to consensous that the bunkering at Huntingdale is/was weak. By the late 30's the MacKenzie style must have been well established in the Sand Belt -- why didn't it rub off on to Huntingdale? And is there a similar MacKenzie-style found in New South Wales and South Australia, and if not, did the Sandbelt style have to compete with whatever was found in those states? I can't see the Sand Belt bunkering having to worry about competing with anything -- even the distinctive Alison bunkering --  and in my mind variety is the spice of life.

What year was Alison engaged? And what do you attribute the failure of the bunkering in not reflecting his distinctive character -- were his notes and drawings unclear as to the actual design details -- and has there been any talk of trying to re-establish Alison's initial vision? It sounds to me like Colt's concerns were waranted. Can you post his original plan and some photos of the golf course -- it would be interesting to compare the two and to also compare them to his other designs from around the world?

As far the rear bunkering, from my limited study of Alison I can can recall a few, but not many. One reason may be the fact that many of his greens were boldly elevated and anything over the green was in deep do do -- are the greens at Huntingdale elevated? I agree that he seemed to favor the very deep flanking bunkers.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

TEPaul

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #37 on: January 06, 2002, 08:34:57 AM »
Paul:

I really enjoy your commonsense analysis of this particular subject and some of your information and conclusions on the details of it.

I know virtually nothing about Alison's courses, his style or his architectural philosophies. And I've never been to Australia.

Except for one thing: My very recent study of ALison's input into completion recommendations for the 1921 Pine Valley committee following the death of George Crump. There are a number of hole drawings and textual recommendations on the drawings filed with the 1921 committee that I'm assuming were those of Alison. Matter of fact, logic would indicate they had to be his.

I was really struck by the sophistication of them and also the logic and detail of both drawing, detailed dimensions and text explanations although on each was the note that they were to be considered "preliminary" and latitude for interpretation on the ground was advisable--but exactly how to do that was also explained.

I mention this only because it indicates how comprehensive and accomplished Alison must have been. And it seems to show in what you reported about the way he collaborated with those in Australia from England in quite a bit of detail even if he did not know them. The two green option thing was very interesting!

And it's so true what you say about Huntingdale being basically a flat site. A flat site and basically a blank canvas on the ground and on a topo that way is the same blank canvas on a drawing board in both England and Australia. That must have given him certain latitude or at least given him a certain lack of complexity to work with. If someone asked him to mail in a routing/design for the Canadian Rockies, I'm quite certain he would have demurred or gone there!

If I were Alison though, I think, even at the Hungtingdale site  I would have first asked what surrounded the property, even at a distance and if that was visible!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Chris Kane

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #38 on: January 06, 2002, 11:44:08 PM »
Paul,

Are there plans to continue the Newton Grant & Spencer redesign to other parts of the course?

Considering that 7 holes are now modified, do you see benefits in remodelling the whole course to reflect one style, or do you favor hanging on to what little traditional architecture is left there?

Also: do you think the change of date for the Masters from February to November will have a serious impact on the way the course plays?  I recall someone mentioning in a previous thread that RM will play differently in the Heineken from how it did during the President's Cup, due to firmer conditions associated with the climate.  Reverse effect for Huntingdale?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Peter Goss

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #39 on: January 07, 2002, 02:28:14 AM »
Paul
I found your reply fascinating and very informative. I am still awaiting word from Greg as to whether Allison suggestd the front of green bunkers at Huntingdale on the original plan or whether Berriman was the instigator.
I had not realised the almost complete absence of back of green bunkering at Huntingdale or the similar absence at the Berriman designed Sale course. There is a similar heavy flanking of greenside bunkering at Sale, a few front of green bunkers on par 4s and only one back of green bunker on the course - a par 3 to save the ball disappearing down a 100 foot drop to the wetland area.
We have already heard on this forum that Berriman favoured larger than usual (for the day) greens. If heavily flanked bunkering, occasional front of green bunkering and almost complete absence of back of green bunkering are consistencies on other Berriman courses we could possibly conclude a very strong Allison influence on his work.
It has been suggested that the strength or forthrightness of Berriman character compared with that of Alex Russell gave Berriman the nod ahead of Russell on a number of Victorian contracts including Sale.  I wonder whether the Allison association and influence may have carried a little more weight for Berriman than has been given credit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Greg Ramsay

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #40 on: January 07, 2002, 05:14:18 AM »
Peter, on Alison's plan there were still entrances to 2, 8,13, 18 so none of them had bunkers directly in front of them.  8 still had the bunkers 10 metres or so in front, but you could still bounce the ball short and run it on.

I'm not sure where you are asking pre- the NG&S renovation or since.

Greg
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Peter Goss

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #41 on: January 07, 2002, 05:34:03 AM »
Thanks Greg.
I was asking about the pre redesign holes at Huntingdale.
A reasonable conclusion would be that the immediate front of green bunkering is a Berriman characteristic rather than an Allison trait.
Paul Daley commented on the absence of back of green bunkering - if you still have the original Allison plan handy, I would like to ask the same question - is this in the design of Allison or is it the work of Berriman?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Greg Ramsay

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #42 on: January 07, 2002, 05:34:18 PM »
Peter, the only back-of-green bunker in Alison's original plan is at the back of the 12th, the short par 3 which has some spectacular bunkering.  Alison basically had it ringed by bunkers, but what Berriman actually implemented is a ring, minus the back of green bunker, confirming as you suggest that Berriman did not instal back of green bunkers,

I think it is a shame that Berriman out performed Russell in securing more design jobs, i think Russell's courses have made a stronger reputation for themselves, even though there are only very few around that we know of.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tom Macwood (Guest)

Re: Course design in absentia (Alison and Huntingd
« Reply #43 on: January 09, 2002, 03:38:53 AM »
How would you describe Berriman's bunkers and do the reflect what is seen in Alison's plan? What is the date of Alison's plan? Did WWII have any effect on the develepment of Huntingdale?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »