This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.
Quote from: Kalen Braley on April 18, 2011, 05:09:22 PMI'm also thinking that I swap out 1 and 2 to be 10 and 11 respectively. The flow to 3 and 12 would work a little better, and you save the epic "sand belt" nature of #2 for later on in the round as that hole looks to play thru Nebraska and eastern Colorado! Suggestions of this nature should be written on a $100 bill and mailed to the architect.
I'm also thinking that I swap out 1 and 2 to be 10 and 11 respectively. The flow to 3 and 12 would work a little better, and you save the epic "sand belt" nature of #2 for later on in the round as that hole looks to play thru Nebraska and eastern Colorado!
Quote from: Bill_McBride on April 18, 2011, 05:35:03 PMQuote from: Kalen Braley on April 18, 2011, 05:09:22 PMI'm also thinking that I swap out 1 and 2 to be 10 and 11 respectively. The flow to 3 and 12 would work a little better, and you save the epic "sand belt" nature of #2 for later on in the round as that hole looks to play thru Nebraska and eastern Colorado! Suggestions of this nature should be written on a $100 bill and mailed to the architect.I was kind of hoping to see a $100 bill coming my way. Free advice ain't exactly free anymore these days!! Besides that routing change would save at least $10 mill in cart path construction expense alone.
Quote from: Kalen Braley on April 18, 2011, 05:42:04 PMQuote from: Bill_McBride on April 18, 2011, 05:35:03 PMQuote from: Kalen Braley on April 18, 2011, 05:09:22 PMI'm also thinking that I swap out 1 and 2 to be 10 and 11 respectively. The flow to 3 and 12 would work a little better, and you save the epic "sand belt" nature of #2 for later on in the round as that hole looks to play thru Nebraska and eastern Colorado! Suggestions of this nature should be written on a $100 bill and mailed to the architect.I was kind of hoping to see a $100 bill coming my way. Free advice ain't exactly free anymore these days!! Besides that routing change would save at least $10 mill in cart path construction expense alone. See post 35: The course will be walking only, in the the style that is currently a la mode.
Quote from: Bill_McBride on April 18, 2011, 05:45:19 PMQuote from: Kalen Braley on April 18, 2011, 05:42:04 PMQuote from: Bill_McBride on April 18, 2011, 05:35:03 PMQuote from: Kalen Braley on April 18, 2011, 05:09:22 PMI'm also thinking that I swap out 1 and 2 to be 10 and 11 respectively. The flow to 3 and 12 would work a little better, and you save the epic "sand belt" nature of #2 for later on in the round as that hole looks to play thru Nebraska and eastern Colorado! Suggestions of this nature should be written on a $100 bill and mailed to the architect.I was kind of hoping to see a $100 bill coming my way. Free advice ain't exactly free anymore these days!! Besides that routing change would save at least $10 mill in cart path construction expense alone. See post 35: The course will be walking only, in the the style that is currently a la mode.Sorry Bill,I'm not a mind-reader. This is post #27, so #35 still seems to be aways off yet!
I'm sure the alternate 9th green was an afterthought so you can avoid New Jersey...P.S. I am so happy to learn that hitting CTL + makes the screen bigger! Now how do I make it smaller?
Those last 3 holes are feeling/looking kind of redundant!!