Went to Tuesday practice round and Round 1 Thursday.
Quick impressions:
-I'm guessing the course looks great on TV, but that's not necessarily a good thing if you like your Opens to be contested around par. Drives are kicking up rich, dark divots on first impact and getting moderate roll at best from there. That lengthens the course a bit, I suppose, but it also mitigates roll-through that would (should) scoot overly-aggressive or wayward tee shots into less-desirable lies.
Greens are also holding -much- better than I would have expected. The par-3 13 is a prime example - the back right pin on a green that can play like a fader's Redan was kicking balls half the expected distance, even into the evening. That hole's entire defense is a devilish green and the golfer's ego - and soft conditions mitigate both.
-I cannot believe that Crooked Stick would ever have become "too short", but if that phrase is used to mean not long enough for a future all-ages Open, then it just might be. The length of the course is all in its par 4s, and so many of those have cuttable doglegs or little jogs that it measures much longer than it plays. And with the exception of #17, the wonderful par 3's are likely mid-irons at most.
-Organizationally, it seems to be working very well. The back 9 is a terrific spectator's routing. "Good spots" on 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 are all a few footsteps away.
-I'm always amazed at how badly an event like this damages a course.
-Tom Watson may not be a fan. The local paper (Indianapolis Star) quotes him: "You can't hit it here, you can't hit it here, you can't hit it here, you can't hit it here. . . . a lot of can'ts out there rather than cans, the way I look at the golf course. That's Pete's magic, I guess you might say."
So Tom Watson likes to look at cans when he's out playing golf. At least he and I have one thing in common.