I agree with most of the comments about Wilmington North. It is a solid, fun course, but not great. The South takes up the center of the property and so the North is routed around the edge, which leaves it with some difficult spots. That said, they have made some improvements through the years. The old routing had the tee for the par 3 7th right next to the tee of the 6th, so you had to play 6 and then walk all the way back to the tee to play the next. The new 7th is better, but the routing still feels a little forced (the old 7th is now a practice green). The edge of the property does include some good land and the view from the 11th green is the prettiest on the property.
I always enjoy playing the North, but there are too many weak holes to make it a really good course. For example, the lake on the par 5 18th is too large and in a bad spot on the hole. After a decent drive, the average player has to either carry it 220 yards and leave himself a 50 yard pitch or lay up with a wedge and have 150+ yards in.
Interestingly, the course is considered "much" easier than the South by most people, but when they played the mid-am there a few years ago, the scoring was pretty similar (I think the the North was a little lower, but not as much as most people expected).
The South has been closed for a year for a major renovation. Does anyone know what the changes are and whether they make sense?
Thanks
Art