News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


T_MacWood

Re:Football vs. golf architecture
« Reply #50 on: September 21, 2006, 11:14:11 PM »
Boy am I disapointed...I thought for sure this thread had to be discussing golf architecture or football...these deceptive tactics must stop. Delete this thread.

Doug Siebert

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Football vs. golf architecture
« Reply #51 on: September 22, 2006, 12:26:03 AM »
OK, so trying to combine the two:

So which (non dome) stadium would be the most difficult to hit out of from the center of the field at the 50 yard line, if someone got to pick the most difficult line for you?  Anyone have an octuple layer luxury/pressbox that even Tiger couldn't wedge over?  Are pressboxes an overlooked potential hazard for Donald Trump's future "signature" designs?

Who is the best super in the football field business?  Could he cross over to maintaining a golf course or are the jobs just too different?  How about at Augusta pre-rough, where the entire course was one giant fairway, just like a football field?

What college has the fastest and firmest natural grass football field?  Is that an unfair advantage to the punter when it comes to calculating his average due to the additional roll?  Does firm turf help the ground game or the aerial game more when it comes to football?  If your answer is different for football as compared to golf, explain why in less than 5000 words.

Is the best surface for football bent grass or bermuda?  If neither, why are we arguing in another thread about this so stridently that the American version of Godwin's law has been invoked and people are bringing up the Civil War and slavery??
My hovercraft is full of eels.