Tom Paul,
You're absolutely right. I continue to prescribe this very type of exercise in the Donald Ross Society's "Restoration Guidelines" for green committees, but the downside is that it's not as effective with memberships. (See below)
"II. Cultivate Membership Support
a. Transformation of Architectural Features: offer before-and-after comparisons that reveal the natural deterioration and transformation of architectural features, especially bunkers, tees, and greens.
b. Hole-by-Hole Modifications: offer an historical account of all man-made hole modifications.
c. Overall Course Evolution: provide a chronological sequence of historical aerial photography that reveals the overall course evolution, namely with tree plantings and cross-bunker abandonment."
But anytime you push written material -- however sound -- on a membership, they sometimes feel overwhelmed and recoil, especially when drafted from a self-contained perspective. First of all, you and/or the architect does have an agenda, and they tend to know it.
Instead, have an artist, like Michael G. Miller, paint a beautiful oil composition of an original scene to hang in a prominent area of the club, which reveals an original bunker style with a treeless backdrop, for instance. Then the membership can look and feel the difference themselves. They'll start asking questions, like whay don't we have those types of bunkers today? And how did all those trees get around our green? etc.