Andy,
I agree with your comment. I haven't played the hole, but will offer the following observations:
Initially I did not care for the deep center bunker (and like Glenn see no need to double up there) but it does suggest serve to bifurcate (like that one, Dale?) the line of approach and create a genuine option.
If the green is extremely deep front to back, the hole is two-dimensional, at least for the mid capper, in that it can be approached head on to a front pin, presumably playing around 165 yards with a nice backstop, or the right-hand kickplate can be used to sling a similar shot another 30 yards to the rear of the green. Given the orientation of the spine in the green, however, it appears that a ball would merely kick dead left, failing to reach the rear of the green. Perhaps the spine should be angled off the left-hand shoulder along a 10 o-clock to 4 o-clock axis consistent with the traditional redan green orientation.
Another thought would be to shift the green further left toward the creek to make the direct approach more precarious and eliminate the mound/shoulder on the left side of the green. Suddenly bringing the ball in from the right is more appealing.
I also agree that the fairway tongue should be more expansive, perhaps extending farther to the rear.
I don't care for the left-hand bunker but it could be pinched into the green to create more interest to the front pin location. A little false front might help there to.
There. The committee has created a monster!
Mike