News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Joe Hancock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« on: October 26, 2004, 05:26:36 PM »
What would you rather play? What makes for "better" golf?

Several other threads are almost asking this question, so I pose it to ponder. Many of you well traveled GCA'ers can give better examples than I....

Joe
" What the hell is the point of architecture and excellence in design if a "clever" set up trumps it all?" Peter Pallotta, June 21, 2016

"People aren't picking a side of the fairway off a tee because of a randomly internally contoured green ."  jeffwarne, February 24, 2017

ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2004, 05:38:58 PM »
Joe,
  I am in the camp of outstanding in any form is fine with me. Outstanding being thought-provoking and fun. A local example for me is Stevinson Ranch, where the land is pretty much pancake flat, but within that property John Harbottle built some really good holes. Nobody would ever think the "Alps" hole is remotely natural, but it sure is fun to play.
   
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

Joe Hancock

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2004, 05:41:08 PM »
Not coincidently, Ed, I was thinking of you when i said "well traveled...". Thanks for the response.

Joe
" What the hell is the point of architecture and excellence in design if a "clever" set up trumps it all?" Peter Pallotta, June 21, 2016

"People aren't picking a side of the fairway off a tee because of a randomly internally contoured green ."  jeffwarne, February 24, 2017

Wayne_Freedman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2004, 06:54:38 PM »
If you categorize yourself as liking one school and not another, you limit yourself. I can appreciate both.

A 'natural' golf course is often more subtle.

A manufactured one is often more exciting, whether fair or not.

But---no manufactured course can match the excitment of a back nine at Cypress Point, for example.
To me, a place like that is the ultimate.


 





ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2004, 04:19:59 PM »
Wayne,
  You are not following the rules. ;) Cypress back nine is clearly outstanding/natural and that was not a choice. Try again. ;D
   Joe,
   I was thinking more about your question yesterday and Wolf Creek (Matt W's fave) came to mind. I would think that would be an exception for me, because the pictures I have seen show holes that are SO artificial, I think I would have trouble seeing the outstanding features there, which I would imagine there are some.
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

John Foley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2004, 04:27:47 PM »
90% of the time I'll go for Outstanding/Artificial. A great example is Morgan Hill by Kelly Blake Moran. Some of the wildest, most intriguing, funest greens around, but totall 100% overshaped & artificial. I'd go back and play and be challanged every day.
Integrity in the moment of choice

RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Ordinary/ Natural or Outstanding/ Artificial?
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2004, 07:49:09 PM »
It depends on what the natural has to offer.  If it is natural across some interesting ground, I'll take that sort of ordinary natural.  If it is on a plain, unremarkable, uninteresting plot of ground, with ordinary uncontoured greens, and bland hazards, well no one wants a snoozathon... ::)

Give me natural on ground that was ideal for a natural golf course routing and done by some one that knows what to do and not to do with it.
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.