Golf Club Atlas

GolfClubAtlas.com => Golf Course Architecture Discussion Group => Topic started by: Patrick_Mucci on June 16, 2011, 03:36:44 PM

Title: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Patrick_Mucci on June 16, 2011, 03:36:44 PM
Not long ago I played Ridgewood, (NJ) and again marveled at the quality of the 27  holes there.

I recently played Somerset Hills and was recently invited to Baltusrol and Shackamaxon.

Friends recently played Quaker Ridge, Winged Foot (East & West) and Fenway and were raving about all four courses.

While his body of work is not voluminous, it appears, from the 15 or so courses I've played, to be exceptional.

Did he design any mediocre to poor golf courses ?

If so, which ones ?

Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Mark Johnson on June 16, 2011, 03:49:09 PM
9 holes at Erie Golf Club is very urban blah (admitedly on a horrible piece of land)

I wasn't impressed by scarsdale either, wouldn't call it bad, but definitely not memorable in any way.   Doesnt have the normal AWT strong bunkering
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Garland Bayley on June 16, 2011, 03:56:01 PM
Lafayette, Syracuse, NY
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Phil Benedict on June 16, 2011, 03:58:39 PM
9 holes at Erie Golf Club is very urban blah (admitedly on a horrible piece of land)

I wasn't impressed by scarsdale either, wouldn't call it bad, but definitely not memorable in any way.   Doesnt have the normal AWT strong bunkering

I wouldn't want Scarsdale as my regular course either, although it definitely qualifies as quirky.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: PCCraig on June 16, 2011, 03:59:37 PM
Tillinghast's only design in Ohio, Lakewood CC in Westlake, OH is pretty good, but most would probably find it pretty mediocre. Recent minor renovation work has spruced the course up a bit.

One you really don't hear much about on a national level is Golden Valley G&CC in Golden Valley, MN. Despite the not-so-great name, the golf course is just awesome and would be enjoyed by many on here. Really severe greens, awesomely deep and penal bunkering, and really neat fairway contouring...it's a tough but fun golf course. Currently it's on the GW "top 200" classic list.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: JMEvensky on June 16, 2011, 04:00:57 PM
The sound you hear is Phil Young's teeth gnashing at the topic--Tillinghast and mediocre in the same sentence.

How much AWT is left at Metropolis?
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Mark Johnson on June 16, 2011, 04:21:04 PM
Tillinghast's only design in Ohio, Lakewood CC in Westlake, OH is pretty good, but most would probably find it pretty mediocre. Recent minor renovation work has spruced the course up a bit.

One you really don't hear much about on a national level is Golden Valley G&CC in Golden Valley, MN. Despite the not-so-great name, the golf course is just awesome and would be enjoyed by many on here. Really severe greens, awesomely deep and penal bunkering, and really neat fairway contouring...it's a tough but fun golf course. Currently it's on the GW "top 200" classic list.

+ 1.  Love that course.   can definitely name several top 100 courses over which i would much rather play Golden Valley.   Also, it has been lengthed well for the longer hitter while still maintaining its character
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Carl Rogers on June 16, 2011, 04:28:18 PM
Roanoke Country Club, Roanoke, VA ... I know Lester George did a Restoration? Remodeling? Some kind of Work on it a few years back??  Lester, are you reading this thread?

I played there a few times 10 years ago or so.  Having never played another Tillie course I cannot compare, though it is obvious this course is smaller and minor compared to others.  Very rolling property ... Par 3's are strong holes.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Paul Jones on June 16, 2011, 04:33:40 PM
I played a course in Tulsa, OK that he did that was mediocre at best - Tulsa CC. 
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Steve_ Shaffer on June 16, 2011, 04:57:27 PM
Re: Metropolis

Here is my previous thread:

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,41469.0.html
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Steve_ Shaffer on June 16, 2011, 05:08:22 PM
Re: Tillinghast in "Coal Country"

Here is my previous thread:

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,14537.0.html

I have not played Irem Temple or Valley but I'm planning to do so this summer. Wyoming Valley, although not rated in the Top 20 in PA,is definitely a fun course to play.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: JMEvensky on June 16, 2011, 05:20:32 PM
Re: Metropolis

Here is my previous thread:

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,41469.0.html

Thanks.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Alex Lagowitz on June 16, 2011, 05:23:56 PM
IMO, his best work is not evident at Forest Hill FC and Suburban CC
The original course at Essex County Country Club was a tilly, but the membership felt the course was weak and so Raynor/Banks rebuilt the new course
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Andy Troeger on June 16, 2011, 07:39:29 PM
Rock Hill CC in South Carolina is by no means a poor course, but nothing special either.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Tom_Doak on June 16, 2011, 08:36:45 PM
Patrick:

I find it hard to imagine that Mr. Tilinghast avoided at least a couple of projects in his career where the client and the parameters of the project turned out not to be what he expected when he signed the contract.  It happens to all of us!
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Kyle Harris on June 16, 2011, 08:46:59 PM
The work Tillinghast did (though NLE) at Old York Road CC has an oral tradition of being fairly pedestrian. The gutting the of the remaining holes has eliminated most of the remaining Tillinghast though some traces remain - including a moat hole.

The Tillinghast holes (8, 12-16) at Galen Hall CC are eclipsed by the contributions of both Alex Findlay and William Gordon.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Tom MacWood on June 16, 2011, 11:09:06 PM
Poor or mediocre, probably not, but he did redesign Shawnee two or three times, in short order, after first laying it out. Not totally unexpected considering it was it was his first project.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Sam Morrow on June 16, 2011, 11:41:32 PM
I played a course in Tulsa, OK that he did that was mediocre at best - Tulsa CC. 

Tulsa CC isn't anything special but I look forward to seeing the work Rees Jones has done.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Sam Morrow on June 16, 2011, 11:47:12 PM
No matter who you are, if you design that many courses you are going to have some clunkers, it's a numbers game. Looking at the Tillinghast Society site I am going through his courses that I've played and don't consider more than mediocre are Cedar Crest and Corsicana.  I played Cedar Crest 2 weeks ago and it has some of the worst par 3's I may have ever seen. Corsicana is an interesting case. I used to be an assistant there and at one time it was one of the best courses in Texas but much of the work Tilly did in 1926 is gone. The most interesting feature lost is the old 10th green, at one time it was said to be the largest green in the world and had some crazy slopes in it. Over time this green has simply become a big, flat green.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Patrick_Mucci on June 16, 2011, 11:47:36 PM
Tom Doak,

One would expect so, however, my limited play of his courses didn't bear that out and I was curious about the AWT's I hadn't played.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Ed Oden on June 17, 2011, 12:08:22 AM
Patrick, every Tilly course I have played has been truly top notch.  But I suspect that is a bit deceiving since, like many of the ODGs, much of his lesser work probably doesn't exist anymore.  Work that didn't pass muster has likely long since been redesigned or replaced by someone else.  So I don't think you can assume that he never swung and missed just because what remains today is first rate.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Morgan Clawson on June 17, 2011, 09:51:42 AM
Tilly built Rochester Country Club in Rochester, MN.

It opened for play in 1927.

Unfortunately, a 15 year tree planting program began in the 30s. More unfortunatley was the choice of trees - pines. They liked the pines so much they planted 30,000 of them and incorporated one of them into their logo.

The pines line the fairways, narrow the playing field, and make escape shots difficult.

Click on the website. The two photos that scroll-through on the main page tell you everything you need to know: http://www.rgcc.org/ (http://www.rgcc.org/)
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Patrick_Mucci on June 17, 2011, 11:02:00 AM
Morgan,

Absent the trees, what's the quality of the architecture, the course ?
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Barry Stern on June 17, 2011, 12:10:18 PM
I agree with Pat that Ridgewood is a truly exceptional golf course, and I have likewise enjoyed all my rounds at Fenway and QR over the years.  I'm wondering where the newly named Paramount (formerly Dellwood) fits into the discussion of regional Tillie courses; does anyone have any recent experience with the club?
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Patrick_Mucci on June 17, 2011, 02:14:10 PM
Barry,

I liked Dellwood.

There were a few holes that were either new or redesigned, but, I liked the golf course, it was unique and fun to play.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Tim Martin on June 17, 2011, 02:18:09 PM
Barry,

I liked Dellwood.

There were a few holes that were either new or redesigned, but, I liked the golf course, it was unique and fun to play.

I played it recently and concur with Pat. Jim Urbina has been retained and has already done some work on the outward nine.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Mark McKeever on June 17, 2011, 02:40:35 PM
Re: Tillinghast in "Coal Country"

Here is my previous thread:

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,14537.0.html

I have not played Irem Temple or Valley but I'm planning to do so this summer. Wyoming Valley, although not rated in the Top 20 in PA,is definitely a fun course to play.

A few of these coal country clubs are on my reciprocal list and I managed to play Wyoming Valley last summer with a secret agent.  Very neat golf course as Steve said.  I felt like I was playing golf in Vermont or New Hampshire a few times.  They have a really solid drop shot par 3.

There's 2 or 3 others on my list to play this year.

Mark
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Niall Hay on June 17, 2011, 03:06:08 PM
One you really don't hear much about on a national level is Golden Valley G&CC in Golden Valley, MN. Despite the not-so-great name, the golf course is just awesome and would be enjoyed by many on here. Really severe greens, awesomely deep and penal bunkering, and really neat fairway contouring...it's a tough but fun golf course. Currently it's on the GW "top 200" classic list.

Speaking of AWT in Minnesota, what about RGCC in Rochester? How much of AWT is left there? It used to be very highly rated in MN behind only Hazeltine and Interlachen.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Niall Hay on June 17, 2011, 03:07:26 PM
Tilly built Rochester Country Club in Rochester, MN.

It opened for play in 1927.

Unfortunately, a 15 year tree planting program began in the 30s. More unfortunatley was the choice of trees - pines. They liked the pines so much they planted 30,000 of them and incorporated one of them into their logo.

The pines line the fairways, narrow the playing field, and make escape shots difficult.

Click on the website. The two photos that scroll-through on the main page tell you everything you need to know: http://www.rgcc.org/ (http://www.rgcc.org/)

Wasn't Sheldon the planters name?
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Niall Hay on June 17, 2011, 03:08:44 PM
Morgan,

Absent the trees, what's the quality of the architecture, the course ?

Its a really fun golf course, ton a very good holes.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Rick Shefchik on June 17, 2011, 04:21:39 PM
Morgan,

Absent the trees, what's the quality of the architecture, the course ?

Patrick, I can answer that. The quality of Rochester G&CC is outstanding. I have seen it ranked among Minnesota's top 5 courses several times. While I wouldn't put it quite that high, there are no weak holes at Rochester. I've recently learned that the tree planting was done with Tillinghast's approval, though he may not have intended for the forests to become quite as thick as they are now.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Kyle Harris on June 17, 2011, 07:24:39 PM
Valley CC is really special.

Pat, the first green at Valley CC once piqued your interest from a picture I posted a few years ago.
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Patrick_Mucci on June 17, 2011, 09:32:26 PM
Valley CC is really special.

Pat, the first green at Valley CC once piqued your interest from a picture I posted a few years ago.



Kyle,

Could you post it again.

Thanks
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Steve_ Shaffer on June 17, 2011, 10:21:42 PM
Pat

Re: Valley CC

Courtesy of The Bausch Collection

http://www.myphillygolf.com/uploads/bausch/Valley/index.html
Title: Re: Did Tillinghast design a mediocre or poor golf course ?
Post by: Malcolm Mckinnon on June 18, 2011, 01:32:28 AM
RE: Scarsdale GC

I feel compelled to come to the defense of Scarsdale as I have deep family roots there. I would describe the golf course as "sporty".

As Tom Doak pointed out some properties are more challenging than others. Scarsdale, in my opinion, would be high on that list. There are three very abrupt par threes either uphill or downhill that facilitate transitions around the property that otherwise would have been near impossible. The rocky terrain and severe undulations of the land also have led to a routing that provides an unfortunate quantity of blind shots. Not a fun place to play if unfamiliar with the course.

I may get severely flamed on this one but one Tilly course I thought was rather ho-hum and forgettable was Philly Cricket's Flourtown layout. Admittedly, this was many years ago and that nearby Llme mine makes for some fantastic grass!