I played Scioto in 1992 nd just didn't get it. Some of that is attributable to some clumsty redesign work by Dick Wilson/Joe Lee/Bob von Hagee in the early 1960s, and Bob Cupp's two greens in the mid-1980s were just about what one would expect from him - awful. Scioto, though well-routed, struck me as a golf course that had lost any charm, and then was over-treed. So it stands right there with other hacked-up Ross courses that need desparate attention: Oak Hills and Inverness come immediately to mnd, and whatever there is of Oakland Hills worth recommending is not Ross' doing but Jones.I didn't pick Maidstone as one of my LI favorites because it has six or seven truly dull holes interspersed with six or seven really fine ones.As for Strantz, I loved Caledonia, absolutely detested Stonehouse as unmaintainable and unplayable, and thought the first 16 holes of Royal New Kent were terrific - until the last two holes, which are straight out of a really bad Florida real estate layout. In any case, Strantz is interesting, visually the most experimental of all designers, and at least he generates discussion. Also disgust when he goes overboard, which noew, it seems, is everytime he designs.