News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Bias Toward "Big" Courses
« Reply #25 on: April 14, 2003, 01:25:25 PM »
You can definitely say one thing for Augusta, the prices are right. $125 for a pass. :o
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

Carlyle Rood

  • Karma: +0/-0
Masters Prices
« Reply #26 on: April 14, 2003, 01:31:15 PM »
MASTERS
Coke $0.75
Beer $1.75
Imported Beer $2.25 (Heineken)
Ham Sandwich $1.50
Turkey Sandwich $1.50
Club Sandwich $1.75
BBQ Sandwich $2.00
Chips $0.50
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Bias Toward "Big" Courses
« Reply #27 on: April 14, 2003, 03:56:51 PM »
Carlyle I am glad to see the ticket is tiger Red on sunday.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Matthew Schulte

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Bias Toward "Big" Courses
« Reply #28 on: April 14, 2003, 08:18:25 PM »
Perhaps an interesting question would be what architects have been successful at making a small property feel big, and what techniques did they use to acheive this?  How do some architects make a course play longer than the yardage?  Is it almost automatic that the architect wisely avoids the par 72 temptation, to make it play bigger than the yardage?  What do these successful small property designs have in common?  

Pasatiempo...6400 yards.  Plays considerably longer.
Pacific Dunes...6500 yards.  Obviously plays longer due to wind.
Cruden Bay...6400 yards.

Caledonia & Tobacco Road were also big feeling designs on small plots of land.

One common thread of the above courses would be big features.  Be it dunes, bunkering or contouring.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:04 PM by -1 »

ian

Re: The Bias Toward "Big" Courses
« Reply #29 on: April 14, 2003, 09:12:26 PM »
Since we did Osprey Valley (heathlands), the acreage is actually 160. Nowadays 150 acres feels tight when many projects are 200 to 250 acres. The property size just grows and grows with the safety width increases brought upon by technology.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Bias Toward "Big" Courses
« Reply #30 on: April 15, 2003, 07:25:51 AM »
Bill/Redanman I would still like to think the men in Green jackets would like to see Red stand for the Georgia clay, University of Georgia or maybe Tiger red long before anything to do with the dreaded Canucks. I do love Jasper Park and most anything Stanley T designed, but the Southpark boys had it right on the Canucks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »

henrye

Re: The Bias Toward "Big" Courses
« Reply #31 on: April 15, 2003, 08:08:26 AM »
Thanks Ian.  160 not 100.  Probably why it doesn't feel tight.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »