I really think the market for alternative amounts of holes is at already existing golf prosperities as a secondary or as a relief course.
As that is one of the few situations I can see the economics work. As it might encourage a golfer to spend the day and eat 2 meals at the clubhouse. Not to mention the opportunity to have a larger diversity of logos in your shop.
But, beyond that I think it’s a tough sell as a standalone idea. I can think of 1 course close to you Jordan. Crumlin Creek in London, Ontario. It’s a novelty at best and it’s not the short course that I recommend to people visiting that being the rollicking Thames Valley courses. But, you should check out both when you get the time.
Yes. It's no coincidence that it is the high-profile, high-end resorts that have led the way in developing quality par three and other shorter courses in recent years. In the past, they wouldn't have done so, because a lot of their customers would play two full rounds a day, but the slowing of play (and the less active lifestyles most people lead nowadays) means that a 36-hole day is a tougher sell. So a short course that can be played after your main round (sometimes even after dinner in summer) is a winner in terms of encouraging more play.
The media is really keen on alternative provision, because it's a great story and they can spin it as a grow-the-game initiative. How a short course at an elite resort (or indeed an elite private club) is supposed to encourage new people to take up the game, I can't see.
Short courses at proper public facilities in easily accessible locations absolutely would help grow the game. Some years ago, Frank Pont had the idea that nine hole courses, possibly reversible, possibly on brownfield sites, in urban locations, would be a good business opportunity and would help grow the game. He built one such course, Links Valley in the Netherlands, though it isn't exactly a super-urban site -- it's about forty miles from Amsterdam (
[size=78%]https://www.thelinksvalley.nl)[/size]. But I don't think the idea has taken off in quite the way he hoped it would, and clearly it's because the economics of such courses aren't enough of a slam-dunk for a bunch of people to stick money into them.