Contemporary tastes

[MCirba]

Didn't punitive golf come into acceptance, around the same time as the space race? USA wanted to be stronger/faster/harder than USSR and GDR, and RTJ and others were just the guys to do that.

Restrictive trees and restrictive rough and reduced options do not make for greatness.

Ron,


If you're going out to Sag Harbor this year I'm going to insist you need to hit Shelter Island, as well.   


Me, Joe, and Mike Trenham had a fun day this year playing 3 nine holers...Shelter Island, Sag Harbor, and Poxabogue.   Geoff Walsh joined us at SI.  Shelter Island is at least an 8 or 9 on the Quirkometer.

[Ally Mcintosh]

Ah never mind….

[Thomas Dai]

Ally,

When I penned my earlier post I had TOC in mind. I was particularly wondering the extent to which shots hit with a modern era ball and modern era Driver if hit from the same spot and on the same line as a tee shot with a ball and club of yesterday would go through the fairway into longer grass or gunch thus reducing the effective fairway width.


As to short-n-straight, thanks for the accuracy compliment, an often forgotten aspect of less powerful players is that if they do go off the short grass they don’t have the strength to muscle the ball out or muscle it out very far. They thus have to be very careful in the playing lines they take and sometimes these are adversely affected by forced carries. Lack of trajectory also has a similar impact as features, hazard etc can’t necessarily be carried nor can soft landing approaches with longer clubs be achieved so easily. Hence width and short grass are important as they provide alternative playing lines and routes. Indeed it could be argued that width and short grass are more important for less physically powerful players than for those of a stronger physical disposition.

In addition, playing regularly with someone who with the same club and ball hits the ball near twice my distance it’s become very noticeable over the years how our playing lines vary and also how easy it is for a longer hitter to hit through fairways into places they would probably prefer not to be. As such it’s also apparent how some shorter courses can in social play circumstances be uninspiring for long hitters if they are forever having to club down, unless that is they particularly cherish the very specific merits of precise lay-up accuracy that a chess on grass type of management course style can bring.

And as has been intimated, there’s not much worse, not much less fun, than looking for a lost ball, unless that is it’s looking for someone else’s lost ball!

Your take on the 11 ‘rules of modern architecture’ does hit a few nails on the head.

Atb

[Carl Johnson]

Width.
If a course has had the same width of short cut playing surface since inception does it effectively play narrower these days given that changes in equipment over the decades have allowed errant and mis-directed shots to travel further away from the short cut playing surface?
Atb

Intuitive.  So, do you widen the fairways further?  Maybe not enough room.  Another impact of tech on older courses.  Of course, some might say you should narrow the fairways to bring the rough even more into play -- make the course difficult, which is more fun???

[Matt Schoolfield]

Some might say there is no accounting for tastes.

I've written about here and formally about Howard Moskowitz's research on the subject, and I think it's entirely relevant to this thread. It's not that contemporary tastes have change, it's that the entire concept of platonic ideals, and those ideals being refined by aggregation of opinion, is flawed from the start.

[Ira Fishman]

Ah never mind….

Ally,


Although I have not played that many modern courses, I understand why you think that the pendulum may have swung too far away from “difficult” for the good golfer. The reason I post is to ask what features you think should be incorporated to return difficulty given that you stated that lost balls should not be a regular feature which seems to eliminate long forced carries, narrow fairways, and penal rough. You mention firm greens which I embrace despite my old man, low spin game. But what else? Or is it a matter of the rules you identify as being taken too much to the extreme?


Thanks.


Ira

[Mark Pearce]

I have never really understood the (apparently accepted) wisdom that difficult cannot be fun.  Two of the most enjoyable (and memorable) rounds of my life have been on courses generally accepted as very difficult (Carnoustie and Wolf Run) in rounds where I have struggled to score even moderately.


Sean touched upon the importance of recovery shots and the availability of those (even if very difficult) helps make difficult fun.  But also the ability to get your ball round.  Difficult shots that reward being played well but leave a difficult shot if you fail to execute are an important part of the recipe, I think.  Difficult shots that if you fail to execute you have to play again, or take a drop, or spend time looking for a ball you're just going to have to hack out are not fun.


I don't like easy (and that's one reason I rate Kingsbarns much lower than most).  I do love half par holes (one reason I love Elie so much), and I guess I don't mind a course with a load of half par holes where they are half over, rather than under or a mix, and I don't mind holes where I'm going to be really happy to play well enough to make bogey, if the path to that bogey requires me to execute some challenging, fun, shots.

[Ira Fishman]

I have never really understood the (apparently accepted) wisdom that difficult cannot be fun.  Two of the most enjoyable (and memorable) rounds of my life have been on courses generally accepted as very difficult (Carnoustie and Wolf Run) in rounds where I have struggled to score even moderately.


Sean touched upon the importance of recovery shots and the availability of those (even if very difficult) helps make difficult fun.  But also the ability to get your ball round.  Difficult shots that reward being played well but leave a difficult shot if you fail to execute are an important part of the recipe, I think.  Difficult shots that if you fail to execute you have to play again, or take a drop, or spend time looking for a ball you're just going to have to hack out are not fun.


I don't like easy (and that's one reason I rate Kingsbarns much lower than most).  I do love half par holes (one reason I love Elie so much), and I guess I don't mind a course with a load of half par holes where they are half over, rather than under or a mix, and I don't mind holes where I'm going to be really happy to play well enough to make bogey, if the path to that bogey requires me to execute some challenging, fun, shots.

Mark,


I concur re Kingsbarns although admittedly based on one play. I just did not appreciate too much being funneled into play or onto the greens.


I love Elie (two plays in contrast to your many (envious)), and your post made me realize one of the reasons is that it does have such a great mix of more difficult and more manageable holes (and for me relative to par is not as relevant) especially when the wind picked up on both of our plays. But I am a short hitter so a young(ish) gun like Ally might disagree which is why I am interested in how he would make courses more difficult. For me, Ballybunion and Blackwolf Run River are analogous to your views of Carnoustie and Wolf Run.


Ira