While folks generally seem to lament this inflation, I think it’s more important to remember that these private clubs are still providing access, and we should be extremely grateful for that. They don’t have to, I’m quite sure many of these clubs could fill up their tee sheets with guests.
I also think this is a moment where I would push again that there is no prominent rating/ranking system that considers access and value in their rating. As interest in quality golf architecture increases, I certainly think that would be a valuable metric for most people.
I have contended before that I think the current system of rating/ranking is designed to favor clubs over golfers. As prices increase to the point of not just to meeting demand, but actively reducing it, the concept of the value of an experience will become more useful than just highlighting architectural excellence. I realize these prices don’t affect the membership of this forum significantly, as many of us have non-trivial connections to clubs, but I just think that market incentives should reward lists that take value into account as this new pricing paradigm continues.
Again, always a big thank you to clubs out there that offer access when they don’t need to.