I think fundamentally I am in Sean's corner here. There is no doubt that Braid was a fine architect, and has been much underrated for most of the time since his death, but it is fundamentally inconceivable to mention him in the same breath as Colt, imo.
If Gleneagles (which I love and which is unarguably world-class) is Braid's best work, does it match up to Portrush, Muirfield, St George's Hill or Sunny New? Perhaps individually it does; but to have done work of that standard over and over again elevates Colt way beyond any of his contemporaries in my opinion.
FWIW my current total of Colt & Co related projects numbers 454.
Edited to add: I think it is unarguable that snobbery is the fundamental reason why Braid is underrated. The British golf media of the early twentieth century, dominated by Darwin, was a pretty upper-middle class at the least environment. Braid did well to get as much recognition as he did from that world...
Thanks Adam
Good perspective, and there is no fight for a corner to be taken, my hope is only the reassessment of Braid's talent upwards, rather than anyone elses (especially Colt's) downwards. It is not a zero-sum game.
We will never know if Braid had dedicated himself solely to design what would he have produced consistently, if Gleneagles was his ceiling it would be high. The variety and skill he showed in the limited available time indicates he had much more to offer.
Can you imagine what a continuation of their one-off situational partnership may have produced.
Braid had a great deal to offer in routings and how to challenge the very best players.
The Braid/Colt and Colt/Braid courses that are out there indicate it might have been quite the success?
But that, of course, is conjecture.
As previously, Colt was IMHO the consumate and generous collaborator/mentor.
Thanks & Cheers