Other than generating advertising revenue -- what purpose do "the rankings" serve?
I love great wine but only trust reviews done by raters who are part of a subscription-model operation, no ad dollars allowed. (and even then conflict risk/s may be present)
That said, was looking at the Golf Magazine & Golf Digest ratings to see where both stood, and where they materially diverge.
When comparing the top-10 of each, four (4) courses stood out in terms of diverging by 4 spots of more:
Augusta National -- #2 GD vs. #6 GM. (4 spots)
Pebble Beach -- #13 GD vs. #9 GM. (4 spots)
Seminole GC -- #10 GD vs. #17 GM. (7 spots)
LACC (N) -- #16 GD vs. #10 GM. (6 spots)
Of note, Augusta National was actually up 1-spot in the Golf Magazine rankings yr/yr.
Put more simply, Golf Digest likes Augusta & Seminole a lot better, Golf Magazine values Pebble & LACC much more.
Not sure what to make of it but is there some sort of underlying theme apparent to those in the know?