News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Pages: 1 [2]

Adrian_Stiff

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: M&E building new 12 hole course
« Reply #25 on: August 14, 2024, 03:42:42 AM »
This thread to me shows "that good design of a golf course" should be that a course has a returning loop of 9 or similar holes to cater for those golfers wanting play in limited time.


Creating options to golf for 60-90-120-150 minutes or the full THREE HUNDRED is a plus both for desire and commercial reasons.
Logged
A combination of whats good for golf and good for turf.
The Players Club, Cumberwell Park, The Kendleshire, Oake Manor, Dainton Park, Forest Hills, Erlestoke, St Cleres.
www.theplayersgolfclub.com

Peter Bowman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: M&E building new 12 hole course
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2024, 03:55:05 PM »
Quote from: Duncan Cheslett on August 08, 2024, 03:52:30 PM
I’ve long had an interest in the idea of 12 hole golf courses. If the  Prestwick model had been adopted instead of the St Andrews one 150 years ago we would all be playing 12 hole rounds and in my view golf would be none the worse for it.



I stumbled across this club online of which I had never previously heard. My apologies if this has already been covered but a search for Blacknest revealed absolutely nothing.


https://www.nextchapterforblacknest.co.uk/


I 100% agree golf could/should consider building more 12/13/14 hole tracks.  Better for time and energy and even families
[/size]
[/size]I’ve been saying this for quite some time to what few ears will listen
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back