I think St Andrew’s eighteenth is a pretty fabulous hole, a really great example of the power of a single feature, the Valley of Sin. Pros and other very good golfers standing on the tee believe they should make three, and indeed lots do. But it is way less that might normally be expected, because of the influence of the Valley. Those who see it as a poor hole seem to me to believe that any hole averaging below par is weak.
No, not at all and your assumptions are solely your own, Adam....
You are making a case based on the "pro game" (or low HDCP-er) and I see that as irrelevant.
I first played TOC in 1990 (when I was a 6) and my caddy just told me to take out a 3 iron, play it out to the left for an easy flip-wedge into the green.
Given the BACKDROP to this hole and the significance of the course, I stand by my offering that the 18th at TOC qualifies under the premises of THIS thread.
If the hole has ONE determining feature as you state, then 99% of mortal golfers need not worry about it and, to them, it's an easy effing hole of 350 yards with a 150 yd wide fairway, no bunkers, water not really in play (unless you top your tee shot) with an obligatory pause over the bridge for a photo.
Sure, it may be an exciting match play hole for the pros seeking to drive the green through the valley, but this hole has a spectacular backdrop to an otherwise mundane piece of architecture.
Name one other course in the "Top 200" that has such a milque-toast finisher?