It's almost as if they are deciding on the categories in order to help certain courses win. Did they want The Lido not to be overshadowed by Ladera, or the other way around? Your guess is as good as mine.
Are you saying this is a rigged voting process? That does seem to be trendy these days.....
I very much DID NOT say that. There is a difference between a rigged voting process [not counting the votes correctly], and making an editorial decision on how to categorize the contestants, which is what I wondered about.
I am not a GOLF DIGEST panelist and don't know many, so I don't know whether they told the panelists beforehand that Lido was to compete in the public space, or whether they decided afterward, with the numbers in hand. They also did not publish their numbers, so we can't see which course would have benefited from any reclassification . . . though they used to send the results to all panelists, so maybe someone here does know.
Likewise, I don't have any reason to think that any votes were altered in the recent GOLF Magazine list. That was an accusation by one guy whose course got left off. It's worth noting that I made my observation even though my course won one of the prizes, which is a very different situation.