I think we ought to look at clubhouses insofar as who they are trying to serve. I really think clubhouses should be part of the deliberate design process.
I think many private members/country clubs may tend to showcase the course with a view, because much of the purpose of the clubhouse is as a social gathering spot. This makes sense even if it leads to uphill 18th holes more often than we would like.
I have advocated
strongly that
municipal courses should always have their clubhouses along a community thoroughfare if at all possible, as these facilities should serve the whole community, not just the golfing community.
I see public facilities as having far-and-away the most leeway in clubhouse design and placement. If a public course wants to create additional revenue from the restaurant, they may want to put it by a thoroughfare. If they want to give players a member club feel, maybe isolate the clubhouse and include event spaces. Other courses might even just place the clubhouse with a focus on the range as an additional revenue source.
The vast majority of courses I play do not have uphill 18th holes, but I do not frequent private clubs, so that makes sense.
As someone who is a match play guy, I prefer the 17th hole to be the real test, and the 18th to be a birdie opportunity. So, if I ever had a chance at design of a the hilltop members club, it would probably end with a reachable uphill par 4 that uses the elevation up to the green as way to deflect missed shots, while leaving a lay up tier below the green that offers a simple wedge up with an optimal angle.