The business angle of this convoluted deal looks very interesting to me.
Mark my words, the PGA & SSG will cut a deal with PIF and produce a world venue tour that reunites all the name players. It's just a matter of time and details.
Why? Because the SSG investors want to cozy up to the world's largest sovereign wealth fund. That relationship was as much a goal for Fenway Partners, Redbird (Gerry Cardinale), Stevie Cohen, Marc Lasry and Arthur Blank's family offices. Being able to have Yasir's # on speed-dial enables all of them to feed their AUMs, their future investment appetites, and facilitate liquidity for their current portfolio holdings to the largest, most liquid, most powerful fund extant. Becoming effective monopolistic partners across a single sport is a very efficient means of accomplishing this.
This week's deal btw SSG & the PGA Tour was just step one, and designed in some part to meaningfully improve the chances of avoiding an FTC anti-trust action and intense scrutiny of the Tour's 501c3 status. It also gives Jay Monahan a semi-graceful descent into a long state of "garden leave*." It make take weeks or months to come to fruition, but it's inevitable.
All of the above said, I share this board's general take on fandom of the PGA Tour. Save for the majors, it's a tired visual product that lacks any connection to a younger viewing audience and its blatant and transparent greed is grating on its primary demographic. IMO, its greatest value is an afternoon nap enabler. Nothing induces a better snooze then listening to Dan Hicks or Trevor Immelmann describing another up and down from a perfectly manicured bunker. Other than Riviera, Sawgrass or a Major, I prefer watching the PGA Tour from behind my eyelids and am sure there are hundreds of thousands if not more, practicing the same.
* Anyone want to bet against what will become the HBS or Wharton School "Jay Monahan Case Study on How to F...k up a Monopoly?