Saunton, a fine links in many respects, has been criticised for the lack of a long par 5. The members agreed and authorized the lengthening of the 2nd hole. Interestingly, they decided to move the green back, rather than the tee. For turf, they originally considered moving the green, but elected to use the practice green instead.
Many US courses will apparently build one or two new greens that will have playing characteristics that differ from the rest of the course for many years to come. Why build a fresh green when there are alternatives, such as the one chosen at Saunton, that will give a much higher probability of consistency throughout?