This an uncomfortable thread. It is in poor taste to accuse someone of cheating on a public forum.
Bingo.
1. he's not
2. Is golf a better game because some "suit" at the USGA thought anchored/long putters "looked" bad("one" of the early stated reasons to ban anchoring)
3. is golf a better game with Bernhard Langer, a role model in many ways, out of the winner's circle?
4. How many greens have been altered, and how much money has been spent to modify courses due to achoring?(compared to the staggering number altered due to tech increases in length and accuracy)
Finally, if it was such an advantage, EVERYBODY would have been anchoring, the same as they all adopted a multilayer ball, and a lightweight, longer shafted, thin faced rebounding, low spin optimized driver with fargiveness(and now fways, hybrids and long irons) because hitting it farther and longer IS an advantage.
Anchoring wasn't an "advantage" but rather a preference, or a survival tactic for some.