Thanks, Erik! I always appreciate your highly nuanced insights.
I'm sure if there was a related but entirely different organization named the ASCGAA or the ACSGA or something, people might be annoyed if their organization was wrongly linked to Saudi Arabia, even if it's just out of ignorance. And no, not everyone knows the difference.
But please, go on with your super-nuanced takes about how a commentator should resign.
Since you don't seem to have actually read my posts, Erik, allow me to summarize:
I did not say these commentators SHOULD resign. I simply said I guess they WILL resign, giving their well known, loudly voiced opposition to the blood money supporting LIV Golf. I don't care what they do, I just assumed they wouldn't want to be involved with blood money (their term) themselves.
When we argued about this last year, you staunchly defended the PGA TOUR's approach of ban them and smear them as human rights violators. I simply suggested a more moderate, wait and see approach.
Given the events of this week, whose analysis do you think proved more prescient?