Tom's multiple of profits is the right idea, although I might differ on the #. The formulas, whether measured by EBITDA or free cash flows, are the baselines for structuring most acquisition valuations.
There are quite a few variables that would impact both a valuation and a potential bid for the asset:
Does the resort have both more housing and golf capacity? If so, do construction costs justify the expansion? What are the costs of capital, and what is the current cost of debt (if needed to finance the acquisition, or needed for asset servicing)? How fast are operational costs rising? What are the operating margins? Are they expandable?Are operational efficiency improvements complete? If not, what appears to be the cost to making them? Are labor costs stable? What is the deferred maintenance on the physical structures? What is the mix of play, daily fee v. on-property, etc?
Golf courses usually don't trade at higher multiples unless they have developable real estate, and to a lesser degree, year-round playability. Resorts usually are valued on a combination of all the above, but are discernibly impacted by ease of travel for visitation. Bandon, as great as it is, would find some multiple compression on this relative to a Kiawah or Pebble.
I've been wondering a bit about the Streamsong valuation. Without actual numbers and metrics, I'd only be speculating, yet it's interesting to question just how it was conceived. Another big question is what, if any, will be the impact of Cabot Citrus and its future evolution?