I must confess to being a bit surprised by some of the reaction, particularly from Jeff and Adrian. While the Amateur is no longer a major, it certainly hasn't been reduced to a qualifier for the Open, US Open and Masters. Invites to those tournaments are wonderful perks of winning but it is the winning itself which is the real value. It's status comes from the tradition and it's place in the amateur game. I'll no doubt get shouted down for this but moving it about to accommodate another tournament, no matter how grand, seems to me to diminish it. And for what ? To accommodate less than a handful of players ?
Niall
I don't think I'm shouting, but it would seem they would want the best amateurs available for "The Amateur".
I always felt the Amateur and the US Am should be majors, and they were till Tiger won three.
A date change would strengthen the field, whether they want to change the date is up to them.
But, the best supporting evidence I can think of is that the defending champion, Laird Shepherd, is playing...wait for it....in the US Open and skipping defending his title at The Amateur.
That is a pity, and sucks for him-and the event.
To be fair, he's turning pro after the US Open so a later date would've meant he couldn't defend anyway.
If the US amateur forced their champion to pick between the Open and defending, I'd certainly advocate for moving the US Am.