News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Frank M

  • Karma: +0/-0
What course did NOT benefit from tree removal? New
« on: June 08, 2022, 07:44:20 PM »
We often discuss courses that have gone through extensive tree removal/management programs, and generally it is always discussed as a positive initiative. I was wondering if there are any courses where you think tree removal/management programs did not improve the course, or, worse, make the course less appealing.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2024, 04:30:26 PM by Frank M »

Wayne_Kozun

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What course did NOT benefit from tree removal?
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2022, 08:50:23 AM »
It sounds like Mother Nature just did some tree removal at Springfield CC in Ohio - From Bethpage Black Metal's twitter feed:


Coming off hosting U.S. Open sectionals, Springfield CC reportedly experienced a tornado touchdown last night. The club's super reports that many trees down, but greens and sprinkler mains unharmed. A migraine headache to be sure, but true disaster avoided.

Jeff Schley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What course did NOT benefit from tree removal?
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2022, 03:02:09 PM »
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice your gifts."
- Steve Prefontaine

Ally Mcintosh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What course did NOT benefit from tree removal?
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2022, 06:01:04 PM »
There’s a particular area on the Adare course in Ireland that I think misses the trees that were removed in the Fazio re-do.


On balance though, the tree removal over the whole course has most likely improved it.