From the membership's perspective, I believe the renovation was successful. The goal was to upgrade the turf to sustainable drought tolerant grass, expand the greens with additional pin-able locations that kept the "spirit" of the original greens and to add a little bit of length from the back tees. Because of the turf replacement, significant tree removal was necessitated, although the course does remain generally tree-lined and close to the original design by RTJ, Sr from the early 60s. The bunkers were rebuilt (and with lips lowered around the greens) to improve visibility with larger entrances in the front to allow for run-up shots. Unlike the redo at Hillcrest, the goal here was to retain and enhance the original design of the course.
Continued plays will tell, but I think the course is likely slightly easier for the bogey golfer with it being a bit more difficult for the better golfer. The new back tees at over 7,000 yds will be pretty challenging due to the par 71 and lack of long par 5s.
I can post a few pics if anyone is interested.