I didn't have any examples in mind, Sven, and certainly no famous ones. (Drew's assumption is incorrect, as I've never been to Bandon).
I wanted to ask more about the nature & qualities of greatness -- a general question, with well-travelled folks providing examples of great golf holes that support a 'yes' or a 'no' 'for' answer.
I've played many a decent golf hole that 'changes' -- in the playing at least -- over the course of the season, e.g. from wet and slow early to drier and faster later on, with the wind helping for much of the season to the wind hurting for the last two months.
The 'architecture' remains the same, but in the playing that decent golf hole seems to go from multi-faceted and 'strategic' to one dimensional and 'penal', and from a lot of fun to a kind of dull slog.
I'm asking: Is that because the hole is only a decent one and not a great one? Or can 'great golf holes' too play great only some of the time?
A general theory would be nice, but I'd be happy with the views of many individual posters, i.e. "if a golf hole you're familiar with and fond of plays much differently -- for whatever reason(s) -- from one part of the year to another, do you (still) consider it a great one?"