News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


David Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #50 on: November 19, 2021, 12:46:26 AM »
Although the list loses credibility in my mind ranking Pebble outside the top 10. If you offered golfers a round at Pebble vs any of the top 10, Pebble wins 7 out of 10 with the exceptions being Cypress. Augusta National, and maybe Pine Valley. 8)
Not golfers who have played all or most of those 10.
"Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent." - Judge Holden, Blood Meridian.

Peter Pallotta

Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #51 on: November 19, 2021, 02:11:40 AM »
I just now got around to reading the texts/rationales that accompany the rankings.
I thought to myself, lucky for Ran and the credibility of the list (given its clear and distinct sensibilities) that "Pine Valley’s only benchmark is itself."

Jeff Schley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #52 on: November 19, 2021, 04:41:41 AM »
Props to the raters, several of which are familiar posters here.
 
Hoyt McGarity, Scottsdale, AZ (Chairman, GOLF Ranking Panel)
Ran Morrissett, Southern Pines, NC (GOLF Architecture Editor)
Scott Anderson, Eagan, MN
Ian Andrew, Brantford, Ontario, Canada
Joseph Andriole, MD, Orlando, FL
J. Dean Baggett, Ooltewah, TN
Rodolfo Barreto, São Paulo, Brazil
David Baum, Short Hills, NJ
Michael Blackham, Salt Lake City, UT
Jack Bonner, Myrtle Beach, SC
Bart Bradley, Bristol, TN
Thomas Brown, Los Angeles, CA
Frank Casey Jr., Letterkenny, Ireland
Jon Cavalier, Philadelphia, PA
Mack Clapp, Missoula, MT
Tom Clasby, Seal Beach, CA
Mike Clayton, N. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Chris Cochran, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
John Cornish, Brighton East, Victoria, Australia
Ben Cowan-Dewar, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Will Davenport, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Brian Curley, Paradise Valley, AZ
Gordon Dalgleish, Wilmington, NC
Mike Davis, Liberty Corner, NJ
Tripp Davis, Norman, OK
John Dempsey, Pinehurst, NC
Tom Doak, Traverse City, MI
Derek Douglas, Chicago, IL
Barry Doyle, Greenwood Village, CO
Jimmy Dunne, North Palm Beach, FL
Alfonso Erhadt, Madrid, Spain
David Eger, Charlotte, NC
Christian Faergemann, Hellerup, Denmark
Ron Farmer, Markham, Ontario, Canada
Dave Forgan, Missisauga, Ontario, Canada
Noel Freeman, Lafayette, CA
Dana Fry, Naples, FL
Jeff Fujimoto, Scottsdale, AZ
Tim Gallant, Edinburgh, Scotland
Philip Gawith, London, England
Matt Gibb, St Louis Park, MN
Patrick Glynn, Lahinch, Ireland
Kye Goalby, Webster Groves, MO
Michael Goldstein, Otago, New Zealand
Hindrik Gommer, Voorburg, Netherlands
Charlie Grace, New York City, NY
David Greiner, Stamford, CT
Vaughn Halyard, Milwaukee, WI
Gil Hanse, Malvern, PA
Walter Harris, Naples, FL
Niall Hay, Birmingham, MI
Robin Hiseman, Fleet, England
Bill Hogan, Austin, TX
Simon Holt, Edinburgh, Scotland
Barry Hyde, Neshanic Station, NJ
Allan Jamieson, Burlingame, CA
Clyde Johnson, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland
Gretchen Johnson, Portland, OR
Sunil Kappagoda, Hillsborough, CA
Michael Keiser, Chicago, IL
Irv Kessler, Paradise Valley, AZ
Steve Lapper, Far Hills, NJ
Jeffrey Lewis, New York, NY
Hong-Seh Lim, Los Altos Hills, CA
Gary Lisbon, Malvern East, Victoria, Australia
Brooke Mackenzie, Boulder, CO
Don Mahaffey, Edna, TX
Sally Markiewicz, New York, NY
Ashley Mayo, Nashville, TN
Tom McBroom, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Stephen McHugh, Santa Barbara, CA
David McLay Kidd, Bend, OR
Adam Messix, Cashiers, NC
Lukas Michel, Oakleigh South, Victoria, Australia
Kelly Miller, Southern Pines, NC
Adrian Mitchell, Kew, England
David Morgan, Inver Grove Heights, MN
Adrian Morrow, Dublin, Ireland
Angela Moser, Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
Kristel Mourgue D’Algue-Lawton, Bordeaux, France
Nick Mullen, Morristown, NJ
Kotaro Nakamoto, Kobe, Japan
Greg Nathan, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Zach Nelson, Hillsborough, CA
Masa Nishijima, Tokyo, Japan
Derek Oakey, Atlanta, GA
Sang Jun Oh, Seoul, Korea
Michael Pelliccione, Basking Ridge, NJ
Hal Phillips, New Gloucester, ME
Pete Phipps, Raleigh, NC
Lawrence Place, Scottsdale, AZ
Mike Policano, Glen Rock, NJ
Frank Pont, Den Dolder, Netherlands
John Preschlack, Chicago, IL
Tyler Rae, Wilmington, DE
Bob Ranum, Wachesaw, SC
Luke Reese, Boulder, CO
Mitch Reese, Vero Beach, FL
Javier Reviriego, Cádiz, Spain
Paul Rudovsky, Milton, MA
Josh Sens, Oakland, CA
Sho Tobari, Tokyo, Japan
Jim Urbina, Littleton, CO
Chick Wagner, Oakmont, PA
Peter Webster, Dublin, Ireland
Andrew White, Bahamas
Par Widmark, Båstad, Sweden
Peter Wood, Lower Plenty, Victoria, Australia
David Wuthrich, Houston, TX

  • International in blue above: 35 of the 109 which is 32%
  • I count 7 of the panelists as female, but that could be wrong as I'm not sure of first names in some cases.
"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice your gifts."
- Steve Prefontaine

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #53 on: November 19, 2021, 04:41:22 PM »
I spent some time with David Wuthrich this past week, and had no idea he was on the GOLF Magazine panel.


That's the kind of panelist you want!

Jeff Schley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #54 on: November 20, 2021, 11:57:07 AM »
GM - EDIT NEEDED
https://golf.com/travel/top-100-golf-courses-world-by-country/
You list only 11 courses in Scotland, but I won't tell any fellow members, that you left off Royal Dornoch!


"To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice your gifts."
- Steve Prefontaine

Tommy Williamsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #55 on: November 20, 2021, 12:18:33 PM »
I spent some time with David Wuthrich this past week, and had no idea he was on the GOLF Magazine panel.


That's the kind of panelist you want!


He just was added a month ago or so. Good guy.
Where there is no love, put love; there you will find love.
St. John of the Cross

"Deep within your soul-space is a magnificent cathedral where you are sweet beyond telling." Rumi

Tommy Williamsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #56 on: November 20, 2021, 12:24:00 PM »
I spent some time with David Wuthrich this past week, and had no idea he was on the GOLF Magazine panel.


That's the kind of panelist you want!


Not to be argumentative but what “kind of panelist do you want?”


Is it important to have panelists that think similarly or have a wide range of likes and dislikes?
Where there is no love, put love; there you will find love.
St. John of the Cross

"Deep within your soul-space is a magnificent cathedral where you are sweet beyond telling." Rumi

Ally Mcintosh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #57 on: November 20, 2021, 01:47:14 PM »
The kind of panelist that doesn’t advertise that they’re a panelist is surely what Tom meant?

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #58 on: November 20, 2021, 01:53:07 PM »
The kind of panelist that doesn’t advertise that they’re a panelist is surely what Tom meant?


Yes

JStewart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #59 on: November 20, 2021, 09:42:16 PM »



Some notable moves (credit to UKGolfGuy.com for before/after)


- Oakland Hills up 41 to 31 (picture is pre-restoration)
- Baltustrol from unranked to 57
- Inverness up 16 to 65
- Myopia up 20 to 72
- Ohoopee up 25 to 73
- Oak Hill from unranked to 76
- Rock Creek up 15 to 84


The Oakland Hills picture is post-restoration. 

Tom Birkert

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #60 on: November 21, 2021, 05:31:09 AM »
Overall I think this is a very impressive list. Having been incredibly fortunate to play 40 of those listed, it broadly tallies up with some of my thoughts. For a long time I couldn't understand how the likes of Sleepy Hollow and Cal Club were not included.


I'm guessing Yale dropped out due to the shutdown and - assuming the renovation / restoration is successful - I would imagine it would regain a place as it is a spectacular course.


Regarding Pebble, I'm one of those who thinks it not being in the Top 10 is correct. It has possibly the most memorable stretch of holes on the planet in 4 - 10, but several of the rest are clearly not of the same standard. And don't get me started on the bunkers added in the rough on the far side of the fairway on 3, they are a disaster and should be removed immediately.

Brent Carlson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #61 on: November 22, 2021, 03:30:07 AM »



Some notable moves (credit to UKGolfGuy.com for before/after)


- Oakland Hills up 41 to 31 (picture is pre-restoration)
- Baltustrol from unranked to 57
- Inverness up 16 to 65
- Myopia up 20 to 72
- Ohoopee up 25 to 73
- Oak Hill from unranked to 76
- Rock Creek up 15 to 84


The Oakland Hills picture is post-restoration.


Yes, it has since been updated.

Jeff_Lewis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #62 on: November 22, 2021, 01:11:15 PM »
Proud to be a member of the panel and I think we do good work, given the limitations of the process.  Sometimes when I look at the list I think Ran may not be receiving my ballots, though :)


Anyway - any course that's ever been on this list is worth playing most likely and I agree with Tom D that the distinctions between courses' particular rankings are pretty meaningless.   


As much as there have been so many great restorations and so many great new courses built, it still feels to me like there are 50 unequivocally great courses out there and another 100-150 that could conceivably be in that second 50.   I think we all know when we are on one of those upper tier courses that we are having a very special experience. 

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #63 on: November 23, 2021, 11:36:14 AM »

As much as there have been so many great restorations and so many great new courses built, it still feels to me like there are 50 unequivocally great courses out there and another 100-150 that could conceivably be in that second 50.   I think we all know when we are on one of those upper tier courses that we are having a very special experience.


That was Pete Dye's feeling, too, and he filled out his ballot exactly in that manner back in the day.  [Or, Alice did it for him.]


One thing I do not like in the way the voting is now set up is that the computer ballot forces you to make cut-offs at your top 3, top 10, 25th, 50th, etc.  If I think there are five perfect courses, I can't vote them equally, unless I skip the top 3 entirely and put only those five into the top 10.


The advantage of the Doak Scale is that the grade for one course has no bearing on others.

Jeff_Lewis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #64 on: November 23, 2021, 11:46:31 AM »
It would be interesting to see what the list looks like if we could use 1-10 or 1-100 for each course. We are giving the same vote to courses of which we may have pretty divergent views. 

Anthony Gray

Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #65 on: November 27, 2021, 03:17:35 PM »
Can someone confirm/deny that Diamante (Dunes) made changes to the back nine to accommodate building a hotel?  Did they just remove a hole and add a new one or did they make massive changes.  This seems similar to Shanqin Bay but instead of the government it was a large hotel company.


That would explain the major drop in the rankings.


 I would love to know the answer to this. I played it the year it opened and loved it. The layout had perfect level of uniqueness. Tons of eye candy and one of those course you could describe every hole after the first time y-u played it. Free sliders on the driving range and rock and roll on the speakers. You just knew everything about that round was going to fantastic. It was a 10 on the fun scale. What went wrong?


Anthony




Paul Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Golf Magazine - World Top100 2021
« Reply #66 on: November 30, 2021, 11:56:08 PM »
Can someone confirm/deny that Diamante (Dunes) made changes to the back nine to accommodate building a hotel?  Did they just remove a hole and add a new one or did they make massive changes.  This seems similar to Shanqin Bay but instead of the government it was a large hotel company.


That would explain the major drop in the rankings.


 I would love to know the answer to this. I played it the year it opened and loved it. The layout had perfect level of uniqueness. Tons of eye candy and one of those course you could describe every hole after the first time y-u played it. Free sliders on the driving range and rock and roll on the speakers. You just knew everything about that round was going to fantastic. It was a 10 on the fun scale. What went wrong?


Anthony


Anthony,


I just played Diamante (Dunes) with a long time member.  They did change the back nine quite a bit.  The original 10th hole was a Par 5 and now broken into a short Par 3 10th hole and and Par 4 11th hole.  The also gave the land that was the original 11-12 to Tiger Woods Design to build a short course.  The 12th hole is the original 13th, which is a great uphill par 3.  Then created 2 additional holes - 13th Par 5 dogleg right and returning 14th short Par 4 dogleg left.  The member hates those holes, the remaining holes are the same minus the missing 18th hole, which is odd since the course finished pretty far from the clubhouse.  The green site of the original 18th is now a Putting Course.  The member said his favorite hole was the 18th and now it is gone.  I cannot comment since I never played the original course, but 10th hole and finishing on old 17th does seem out of place.  It is still a really good course, but it sounds like it use to be even better.
Paul Jones
pauljones@live.com

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back