You had me at #1, but you lost me at #2 and #3. I'd love to know what is fun about the later two, as perhaps I'm missing something. #2 isn't Gil's; he did a restoration/renovation. I think it is a bit constrained by its property. Tall Grass was enjoyable, but no more fun than others I could mention.
Gil Hanse has mastered the “fun to play golf course”. Rustic Canyon holds the top spot. To think a top name designer claimed the site was unsuitable for a good course is quite humerus. Soule Park in Ojai sits comfortably at #2. Tall Grass on Long Island had a firm grip on #3 before it closed. My regular golf group did a Monterrey trip in September and we finished off at Rustic Canyon. Our overall winner on the trip aptly called it: “sometimes less is more”.
"Mastered the fun to play golf course" might be a minor stretch, though he has a wonderful portfolio of courses.
Doral's most recent renovation certainly doesn't qualify, and though I realize Narin and Portnoo was upsized/scaled and decharmed a bit in the early 2000's since its simple roots and wild "fun" and quirky peak in the 1990's, I was a bit surprised/disappointed with Gil's most recent work there.
Some of the most fun greens were moved simply a few yards and replaced with more generic stuff. 1,2,7(formerly
10, 11 (waterfront/view exposed uphill par 3 replaced by another shorty away from the water ) and 17 come to mind ,the five par 3's were virtually all the same yardage and 18, at the loss of the formerly magically lumpy 17th, was an absolute slog.
A couple of the previously sloggish consecutive par 5's from the last renovation were turned into even more sloggish par 4's(with a cool short par 3 squeezed in between) From 9 to 18 it just feels like you alternate 130 yard par 3 and slog.
A lot of the work just seemed like work to do work.
Less fun IMHO.
I'm really hoping I'm wrong and just had a brain cramp that day.