I think 1 and 9 at Oakmont are outstanding holes that parallel each other.
Your nominations?
Isn't this a random concept that doesn't mean anything? It's like Americans with their crazy sports stats. I don't get it.
Ciao
Sean,
There is architectural interest in how the course is routed. In my experience it’s rare to see two very good holes parallel to each other.
It may be that the lack of trees at Oakmont increases the awareness.
Personally, I try wherever possible to avoid routing successive holes in an “up and down” fashion. If two holes are laid next to each other, it is better if the routing takes you back round to them.
However, it is often impossible to avoid some feeling of 180 degree turns. Where I really try and draw the line is three in a row…. But even that is evident on some of the world’s best courses. Where this is necessary, it’s best to try and hide the feeling that you are tracking back and forth by varying lengths of holes and by introducing any offset you can.