Thank you for your kind and generous words Tom!
May I politely suggest that you and others re-read my first post of yesterday.
If you do you will see that I quite specifically refer to GB, repeat GB, heathland (and links) courses.
My highlighting of the Greeninkers line is because I feel it also happens to sum-up the situation GB heathland (and links) courses have evolved into over the last few years. The cross-reference to the old thread is there to see what others posting herein were thinking a few years ago.
Atb
All good Thomas! My initial response was in reference to GB and I. To reiterate briefly, I believe that climate change will make irrigation a necessity on all closely mown turfs worldwide (it already is in
most places). Either that, or you'll be playing on dirt where there is no irrigation.
Even in the UK and other such climates. Apologies if that was unclear. I also want to reiterate that just because an area is covered by irrigation does not mean it need be soft. The system (for the most part) does what you tell it to. You tell it to water here but not there, and it usually dutifully responds. Similarly, an approach area sees enough traffic so that an unirrigated surface could show significant wear and tear. And by wear and tear I mean dirt, not just brown grass. Non-grass. Ex-grass (to paraphrase Monty Python's parrot routine).
I'll also add that I want what you want. Firm, fast, bouncy (a word that is not used enough), etc. I'll also add that irrigation sucks. There is a reason that you only have to change one letter to form
irritation. It's the number 2 PITA in our industry behind golfers. I would also add that I am fine with dormant turf. It's awesome! What golfers really don't like is turf that is stressed to the point of
loss of leaf tissue aka visible voids of exposed dirt. To ward this off irrigation is usually required.