One of the things that seems to be lost in this convo is the concept of value.
While the course may not be awful, it seems a very poor deal at $200. Just like a burger from In N Out may be a good value at $7, but would you pay $25 for same? Huge difference between being cheap and not interested in the value proposition of a product.
P.S. Full disclosure, I've seen the course in person 3 times, walked it once, and its a $75 course at best. As a comparison in SD, Coronado looks far more interesting...
You nailed it-it's exactly the value for those who it was designed. $73-78 for San Diego residents.
BUT they allow non residents to play for more(way cheaper than paying CA taxes)
Locals who want to play a US Open venue acn do so at a "value" cost.
non residents can choose NOT to play there
I just don't see the problem.
20 years ago it was hip to bash TP and Rees.
Just seems like that ship sailed soooo long ago, especially after two ultra successful US Opens.
It looks well presented(puttable greens that are firm-rare for a US Open baked out normal plinko)
Incredible scenery and what looks like quite a few great holes 3,4,7,14,16 to name a few.
demanding with a WIDE range of different types of players contending.
News flash-the two biggest bomb and gougers finished 1 and 2 at venerable Winged Foot, despite 5 inch rough wall to wall