Seriously, when I was younger, I was amazed at how old men just seemed to enjoy golf even as their distance decreased. At the time, I thought I would be more likely to give it up, rather than suffer the "embarrassment" of hitting fw woods to greens that are under even 200 yards away.
I'm one of those old men and am enjoying life from a shorter set of tees and scoring as well or better than I ever had even though only a few of my tee shots exceed 200 yards on most days. Not embarrassed at all. Shot 39 yesterday (par 36) on the back 9 today on my 68th birthday.
In response to several of the earlier posts, I don’t keep stats on how often I use each club, but this thread prompted me to mentally review my rounds at my home course and analyze which clubs I use and how often. With the variety of hole lengths, green positions and topography of my home course, I am confident that carrying 14 clubs does provide a significant benefit to me scoring-wise. I composed by bag so that I have consistent distances between each of my clubs, at least when I am striking he ball well. While the thought of gripping down on a club and/or taking a half or three quarter swing in order to cover a wider range of distances in order to carry fewer clubs may make sense for some, it does not for me. It’s a lot easier and provides more consistent results to have a single swing that I can use for all of my irons. I am a very fast player and certain that I would not play any faster with fewer clubs. Slow players will be slow and fast players will be fast whether they carry 4 clubs or 14. I know which club I’ll hit quickly on reaching by ball based on the distance (measured on whether I want to land short and run up or go for the middle of the green or the flag) and lie (uphill, downhill or level, rough or fairway). A few things this mental analysis confirms are:
- On par 4’s and most par 5’s my approach shots will be within a 4 club range, depending on how well (distance and whether in fairway) I hit the tee shot. However, the four clubs are a different range on almost every hole on each nine due to the variety of hole lengths and terrain, which to me is an indicator of good course design.
- On a long par 4 with a steep uphill approach over water, I may use any of seven clubs for my second shot depending on whether I need to lay up or go for the green.
- Even having moved up to a shorter set of tees, I don’t hit driver long enough to reach par 5’s in two, so my second shot on par 5’s will almost always be either be a 3 wood from fairway or 3 hybrid from rough (unless I hit a real stinker into the real gnarly stuff).
- On par 3’s, I will almost always use one of two clubs depending on tee and hole position. Only a strong wind or very unusual tee position might expand the options to a third or fourth club
This is all based on having moved up to a shorter set of tees when I turned 65. Before that I probably could have used fewer clubs as I used 3W or 3 Hybrid for lots of approaches and then lots of wedges when I missed greens. Shorter tees that are more aligned to how far (i.e. short) I hit each club are much more fun and I think provide more benefit to carrying 14 clubs than it would if playing from tees that are too long.