Joe M. and I played yesterday on a beautiful day at Joe’s club Chicago Highlands. After I went 3-up through seven holes, Joe found his groove (I lost mine) and proceeded to trounce me for the next eight holes, closing me out on the 16th green. I am second guessing my acceptance of Joe’s (seemingly gracious) offer to host, making it a home game for my opponent on a course requiring plenty of local knowledge. I’ll file that one in the memory bank for future Knockouts. To paraphrase Happy Gilmore: there are only 364 days until next year’s Knockout, so I better get to work. J
It had been 6-7 years since I had played Chicago Highlands and I feel like I owe the course an apology. I was always less harsh on the course than most “architecture forward” folks (read: the GCA.com crew), but I still don’t think I gave it a fair shot based on preconceived notions regarding A. Hills, landfill courses, etc. I can still see myself nodding in agreement with statements like: “why the hell would they hire Art Hills?” “what a lost opportunity!” “OMG the mounding…” “just think what Doak or C&C would have done with this site!”
I had a more open mind this time around and found myself thoroughly enjoying the course. Does it have the “minimalist/naturalist” aesthetic that we all love? No. Does it look like it has been there for 200 years, shaped by the forces of nature with only a few minor touch-ups from the hand of man? Not in the least. But what it does have in spades in a uniqueness and an identity unlike almost any course I’ve played – much different than anything in Chicagoland. The designers clearly tried to create something different, and I appreciate that, even if in my opinion (or others) it didn’t work perfectly in every instance. What I liked about Chicago Highlands: (as previously mentioned) unique, one-of-a-kind holes that you really can’t find anywhere else (#2, 9, 13, 14, etc.); width/wide corridors; firm turf; wind! (probably the windiest golf site in Chicago); interesting greens/ green complexes/surrounds (#1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15); shared fairways. I found myself constantly saying to Joe: “you’re not going to see another hole/green like this in Chicago.” With an open mind, it would be very hard not to have a good time playing this golf course…
The evolution of one’s thoughts about a golf course, or golf architecture in general, is always interesting to ponder and reflect on. I know my own have changed quite a bit over the years. My day at Chicago Highlands was a great example of this.