I think that you two jokesters are misreading intent. I read it as an example of consensus, independent of him and his work. Keeping in mind the vast number of raters that total both panels, that would be a fine example of consensus, if I didn't consider it to be a fool's errand.
How difficult, to separate one's own experience? Those who touch on how someone played, or scored, as the major (and sometimes, only) factor in assessing greatness, are 100% correct. I was once encouraged to play a course like a practice round, if interested in rating. No score to match nor fear; hit tee ball, play from rough, play from fairway, hit chip shot, bunker shot, putts from all over, ALWAYS turning around to make certain that no one is being delayed by my antics.