The numbers from the story, putting them here for the record:
1 (445) SW
2 (575 par 5) 8-iron
3 (350) 3-wood over green off tee
8 (570 par 5) 7-iron
9 (460) SW
10 (495) PW
11 (505) 9-iron
13 (510 par 5) 7-iron – 3-wood off tee
15 (530 par 5) 9-iron
17 (440) SW
</blockquote></blockquote>Lengthening the course would only play into his hands.</blockquote>How about growing high rough (not that Augusta would do it) from 275 yards out to just short of the green on par-4s? Then every par-4 is a lay-up off the tee and accuracy with at least a 7-iron is desired. Now, that's hardly a great solution, but it shows how difficult the problem is. Effectively, Bryson DeChambeau has broken golf.</blockquote>
Bryson does kill it, and I have my own feelings about tech..
but , let's not forget that PW is 6 iron length(5 iron in 1980) and has an 8 iron loft(circa 1980), so an 8 iron on a long shaft, so it's not like he has 120 in, or 115 as Jack's stock pw(50 degrees) distance was.
Bryson's 4 iron has the same loft as Jack's 1 iron, but is at 6 iron length.
Jack hit 8 iron into #2 in shooting 64 there in '65, back when an 8 iron went 145.(of course the tee is much farther back now)
Norman and others used to hit SW regularly into 9.
Tiger hit PW into 15 in '97
The clubs he's hitting aren't that different than bombers of previous eras, he just is coming in from greater distances after longer tee shots,from farther back tees.(where land is available-see hole #3)
#3 is a much better hole now than it was 40 years ago-Daly changed the strategy and tech piled on.
I hope BDC shoots 257