News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Mark Kiely

How about "Moat," the par-4 12th at PGA West Stadium?


It's a very cool hole, imo


Does it need the front bunker though? I actually think it detracts a bit from the hole as it turns the approach into an aerial approach to a yardage, which to some degree negates the advantage of hitting to the right side of the fairway and being able to see the green.  Not that I would change it, it fits the course perfectly and there is a definite skill to trusting youur yardages on a blind shot. 





Considering the hole is named "Moat" and that's where the bunker is, I bet Pete would say it needs the front bunker.
My golf course photo albums on Flickr: https://goo.gl/dWPF9z

David_Elvins

Quote

Considering the hole is named "Moat" and that's where the bunker is, I bet Pete would say it needs the front bunker.


Sorry, i meant doesnt need the front bunker...to be a good hole. Not...to be a moat hole. 


I have seen Doak use half blind feature half a dozen times without a front bunker and it works fine.


Don't get me wrong, I really like the hole and the course and I am glad you brought it up, but it a course not designed for repeat play or a wide variety of golfers and that makes it hard for it to be truly great architecture.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2020, 12:48:50 AM by David_Elvins »
Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.

Mark Kiely

I just meant because the name is moat and that's where the bunker is, I suspect Dye considered the bunker to be the defining feature of the hole, moreso than the half-blind approach.
My golf course photo albums on Flickr: https://goo.gl/dWPF9z

Kevin Pallier

David


I think Tom has already mentioned Alps re: 3rd at NGLA


A couple I can think of  = 7 & 8 Pine Valley






Tags: