To say there is NO evidence that Tiger used is myopic. Galea and growth is evidence, but not convincing to some. In legal terms, it’s a jury question, not a directed verdict. Bamberger’s book presents the evidence and leaves the question open. That’s fair.
Growth? A skinny kid grew up to look like a taller, fitter version of both his parents. Woods is listed as 6-1/185.
The day I graduated from HS, I was 6-2 and weighed 145. I put on 30 lbs over the next 10 years while I was playing college tennis and playing competitive tennis beyond college, and by age 30 looked just like my father, minus the gut. This morning, at age 70, guess what? I am 6-1, 180.
Which is, of course, evidence of absolutely NOTHING. It doesn’t speak to whether or not I used steroids in my 20’s, nor how hard I did or didn’t work in the weight room.
If there was a directed verdict, it would be the judge throwing the case out. There isn’t any evidence. Doesn’t mean Woods didn’t juice, but to call his “growth” over a decade or so evidence is pretty cynical stuff.
And, btw, what do you do with Bill Mallon’s comment?