Military site or landfill perhaps. Although years ago, when I worked for Killian and Nugent, we did a grading plan for a landfill so that the contours could be shaped to a future golf course via proper dumping. Don't think that plan ever came to fruition.
While a "neat idea" to shape randomly to recreate some natural contours, much like you would find in many original designs, its not really the most efficient. For most owners, the cost of moving earth once is almost too much, much less moving it once randomly and then again to fit a golf course.
If starting with a featureless site, its more efficient to route the course, put the big hills where they might need to be (i.e., typically, elevating an area that has multiple tees, perhaps use landforms to separate holes, or build a gentle grade somewhere, uphill in one direction, downhill the next hole coming back, etc.
The trick for any shaping for a gca is to avoid what I call standard shaping to fit the features, i.e., its so easy to build landforms right around the green, tee, etc. They do look better if the angles, heights, etc. are at odd angles, rather than perfectly fit to the green. It seems to me, that thought process would be the essence of a good finished product, whether the contours happened to be at the appropriate angles if random, or not. I get the idea that each green might hit the site at different angles, but if routing occurred after than "random" earth creation occurred, wouldn't the gca just fall back on similar tendencies anyway?