Seven Oaks is not a monster, if I understand correctly what the original question means. Still a helluva test from the back tees. (Hosted NCAAs in mid 70s - Scott Simpson medalist.)
RTJ "has the knack of designing courses that look natural, are fun to play, judiciously punish bad shots and reward good shots, and, while providing a stiff test for the expert, do not break the back of the spirit of the average golfer." HW Wind 1951.
"Golf today, in all honesty, is what the golf course architects have made it -- a game of relaxed recreation and limitless enjoyment for millions and a demanding examination of exacting standards for those few who would seek to excel -- depending on the requirements of the moment." RTJ, Foreword to Cornish and Whitten.
Do these passages not describe Seven Oaks?
Seven Oaks dull, not interesting? "This aggression will not stand, man!" I am totally biased by sentimental connection to the place, but objectively don't the greens alone elevate Seven Oaks well above dull? If there are a better set of greens in Central NY, where are they? Fairway bunkers, meh. I think they're fixing to add some, based on RTJ drawings, so perhaps that will spice it up for you tigers. Leatherstocking is a Doak 6, is Seven Oaks not its equal? Would you hesitate to recommend to anyone on this site that it's worth an hour's detour off of the Thruway, 81 or 88 to play?