Lou,
Some random thoughts.
The response to C-19 has been radical - I don't see so much acrimonious or vitriolic. I understand that there may stronger reactions from some in the US being the land of the free, but I think by and large people are just scared and frustrated because there's no good magic bullet that's going to take us back any time soon to where we were.
It's certainly too early to do a postmortem on this pandemic and the reaction to it. See you in 12 months.
There are a lot of bright disease experts out there in many countries who have led the political side to where we currently are. I think for now I'll trust their judgement that this is all necessary.
I just heard from a doctor on TV who was comparing SARS, H1N1 and C-19. His short answer to your question was SARS was lethal but not very contagious (remember that Toronto was an epicentre); H1N1 was very contagious but not very lethal (0.02%); C19 appears so far to be both contagious and lethal.
The assertion that C-19 is 10 times more lethal than H1N1 was from the WHO, not me. Of course now that they have been smeared by your great leader, I guess they're not to be believed.
On FOX (I try to heed your admonishment about confirmation bias) I read one recovery plan that suggested that they should determine the risk group (old people with conditions) and quarantine them (you) and let everyone get on with their lives.
Unfortunately the data here is that the old over age 60 are accounting for about 40% of cases while the age group 20-59 are accounting for about 60% of cases.
Listening to people that are recovering, there was the comment that the outcome is not binary - you recover or you die. Some who recover will have scarred lungs and compromised lung function.
And, lastly, tonight our staunchly conservative (we're open for business) Premier just announced he's extending the stay home direction for another 28 days.
What does he know that your governor doesn't.
Enough thoughts for tonight.