No the UK doesn't look great but then lets see what actually happens before we judge shall we Erik
I can't speak for others, I didn't judge anything. I'm just sharing the data. This stuff is all just data, and it's interesting from a scientific perspective, as countries have handled things differently, with different population densities, etc.
The UK numbers, in comparison, are objectively "bad." But, someone told me elsewhere that the UK numbers for hospital beds, etc. aren't right, so maybe he's right, and the situation is better than the numbers. Hopefully that site updates with better numbers if he's correct.
Look at the the John's Hopkins dashboard site below. The right hand panel has the world-wide deaths and recoveries and do the math. Of course, the numbers are only as good as the sources and I suspect that all numbers are suspect at this point and probably will be for awhile. GIGO.My point was that comparing deaths to confirmed cases probably under-represents the mortality rate since some portion of active confirmed cases will lead to deaths.https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
Bryan, I get what you're saying that some of the confirmed cases will die, but you can't reasonably get to 20% doing that. Especially not when you consider that a bunch of people have "recovered" and aren't even tallied as having had the virus at all. Millions of people may have had this virus with mild to moderate symptoms and not even been counted.
20% is a HUGE stretch, when all the other estimates have it in the low single digits.