Thinking about Tommy Williamson's and Ronald Montesano's threads on Bay Hill, it occurs to me to wonder if what we saw this weekend at Bay Hill might be the "new normal" for Tour setups. I mean what follows to be free of value judgements; just wondering...
I am starting with the assumption the the PGA Tour, along with the OEM's, very much do NOT want either bifurcation or a roll back. In light of the distance report, is it possible that the PGA Tour is going to setup courses at least somewhat differently, whether to reward accuracy/fairways, or to reduce scoring, or both? Or was Bay Hill a random, one-time product of wind and weather?
It seems to me that the Tour has been a pretty successful business for a long time now, able to identify pretty clearly what is and is not in its financial best interests. If the Tour believes that bifurcation and/or a roll back is, to some degree, an existential threat to their business model, would the Bay Hill "model" work to stave those changes off going forward?
Just wondering...