Brian:
No hassles, my bad. We just have had this war a few times already, Schmidt and I...
And I'm on the side of it being rated just about right, when it's put in the top 18 holes on the planet. Of course I'd put 16 in there also....
WHY? I'll put it to those who disrespect it and say why not?
It's just the most beautiful hole on the planet, it has an incredible green in terms of its shape, with several very tough usable pins, the bunkering is majestic, inspired, gorgeous... it sure as hell is tempting if they use the right-side pin, which is very usable even today...
It's just a great golf hole through and through, and the length of it matters not to me. And for such an "easy" hole, I sure as heck have seen way more scores over par than under in my trips through, with stalwarts from this forum...
As for it being a step above other short holes to which it is compared, perhaps it's the combination of everything that makes it so... that is, Kingsley #2 might surpass it in some ways, but it sure as hell doesn't in terms of setting, so the overall nod goes to CPC because it's close enough in the other factors...
Would it be so bad that the setting puts it over the top?
TH