News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


George Pazin

  • Total Karma: 0
One golf ball architecture
« on: March 30, 2019, 03:27:26 PM »
Our friend John Kavanaugh posited something on my match play rant thread (sorry about the thread) that I found quite interesting and thought provoking:



For instance. In golf if each player was only given one ball and his round was over when it was lost the game would move along quicker and architecture would be far more interesting. Look at any zero tolerance society. Those who remain live happier more fulfilled lives than the outcasts. It's a proven concept.




This is an interesting idea.




How would golf change and how would golf course architecture change if you were only allowed one ball? In other words, if you lose the ball, you're done with your round.

« Last Edit: March 30, 2019, 03:55:01 PM by George Pazin »
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

John Kavanaugh

  • Total Karma: 9
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2019, 03:49:07 PM »
90% of all lost balls are by choice. In my world golfers would make better choices.

George Pazin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2019, 03:53:36 PM »
Can't say I disagree.


Though I am frustrated by the tiny text thing, yet again...
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Steve Wilson

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2019, 01:12:05 AM »
Fewer water hazards (penalty area be damned).  Shorter rough.  More ground game.  Less bomb and gouge. Greater width.  Not sure what we would do about scoring.  Do you win if you take the fewest shots or play the most holes.  I'm not sold that most balls are lost by choice.  I think they are lost though miscalculation of risk/reward or perhaps overestimation of ability.


I knew I'd turned the corner in Scotland last year when, about ten days after the BUDA caravan left town, I played with the seniors on Thursday morning in weather so bad only three of us showed up for the fourteen hole competition.  Heavy winds, rain, and for the only time all summer I played the entire round with one ball.  I was prouder of that than what I shot.  So much prouder in fact I don't even remember what I did shoot as the competition was considered washed out and it wasn't recorded. 


     
Some days you play golf, some days you find things.

I'm not really registered, but I couldn't find a symbol for certifiable.

"Every good drive by a high handicapper will be punished..."  Garland Bailey at the BUDA in sharing with me what the better player should always remember.

Jon Wiggett

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2019, 05:19:22 PM »
Fewer water hazards (penalty area be damned).   



Steve,


but here is the problem with the concept. You cannot lose a ball in a water hazard.


I would suggest a 30 second rule for looking for the ball and then drop with a stroke penalty.


Jon

Wade Whitehead

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2019, 07:59:38 PM »
What are the best golf courses in the world where it's basically impossible to lose a ball?

WW

Daryl David

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2019, 10:53:44 PM »
What are the best golf courses in the world where it's basically impossible to lose a ball?

WW


Gamble Sands. Not sure about best course, but damn hard to lose a ball.

Jon Wiggett

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2019, 03:46:12 AM »
What are the best golf courses in the world where it's basically impossible to lose a ball?

WW



Used to be TOC but too much rough there now.


Thomas Dai

  • Total Karma: 2
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2019, 03:57:44 AM »
Fewer water hazards (penalty area be damned).   
Steve,
but here is the problem with the concept. You cannot lose a ball in a water hazard.
I would suggest a 30 second rule for looking for the ball and then drop with a stroke penalty.
Jon


Good point, although once upon a time, many, many moons ago, the ball would float.
Mind how deep the water might be and if ‘wading out’ may be needed is another aspect of playing it where it lies! But then again wait long enough and the wind may blow a floating ball back to the shore, which time wise brings things back to the merit of the 30 sec suggestion.


Certainly an option to the smash it style of the modern game. Chess on grass once again?


Atb

Kalen Braley

  • Total Karma: 1
Re: One golf ball architecture
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2019, 11:00:28 AM »
Not to steal any thunder here, but I think one club golf courses would be a more interesting thought exercise.