Dye had to create everything as he had hardly no natural features. Doak had to find his course.I would have loved to see what Dye would have done with a property like Ballyneal. Unfortunately, he never got to work on a property as good as that. Unfortunately for Dye, he designed courses in an era where good land wasn't as valued as today.
Matt:
I don't think you will successfully claim that you are a bigger fan of Pete Dye than I am. Maybe you love his courses more, but I spent a fair amount of time with him, and I still remember pretty much everything he ever said to me. I owe him my entire career.
Mr. Dye was still designing courses until about three years ago, so we weren't entirely in different eras. One of my observations from working for him is that he had handicapped himself, by doing the projects he had done, and popularizing the idea that he could take a swamp or a flat desert and turn it into a great course. It put him at the top of the list of designers to call if you didn't have a good piece of land, but . . . it meant that when Dick Youngscap [who had already worked with Pete at Firethorn] or Mike Keiser started thinking about what designer to hire for their projects on great land, they thought others would be better for that kind of ground.
So, I tried really hard to establish a different niche for myself, and it wound up working far beyond my expectations.
I would have loved to see what Pete would have done with a piece of land in the Sand Hills, as a thought exercise . . . I don't think he would have bulldozed the land, as some people think. But, if it was my money at stake as a developer, I wouldn't have bet that he would have built something better than Sand Hills or Ballyneal, and he surely couldn't have built them for any less than the budgets they were built for. And there is a lot of land left out there in the sand hills, so if it's really that easy, other architects should go out and build their own top-50 course instead of complaining about our success.
Working on flat land is undoubtedly harder. But what's the point of trying to give brownie points for that? This thread is about comparing courses, not comparing architects, right? The only reason to compare two courses is to decide where you want to go play. Do you make those decisions based on the course that's on the ground today, or what we started with?